Breaking News

Latest Pandemic Treaty draft has gaping holes because they daren’t reveal what they plan to do

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The latest draft of the Pandemic Treaty proposed by WHO’s Intergovernmental Negotiating Body is an admission of failure so significant that they are suggesting nations sign an incomplete document.

“They know that they cannot show us the details of what they really want to do. So, they are proposing an incomplete, watered-down agreement in the hopes that they will be able to make decisions in the future; in the hopes that we won’t be paying attention,” James Roguski has concluded.


Let’s not lose touch…Your Government and Big Tech are actively trying to censor the information reported by The Exposé to serve their own needs. Subscribe now to make sure you receive the latest uncensored news in your inbox…


Please note:  WHO’s Pandemic Treaty has also been referred to as the Pandemic Accord, Pandemic Agreement and WHO Convention Agreement + (“WHO CA+”).  In this article, we refer to it as the Pandemic Agreement.

The ninth meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (“INB”) started on 18 March and ended on 28 March. “WHO Member States agreed to resume negotiations aimed at finalising a pandemic agreement during 29 April to 10 May” at the resumption of INB9, a statement released by the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) said.

In December 2021 WHO decided to establish the INB to draft and negotiate a WHO convention, agreement, or other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.  INB9 is the ninth meeting of the INB.

The next round of INB9 negotiations will end a little over two weeks before the World Health Assembly.

“Next month’s resumption of INB9 will be a critical milestone ahead of the Seventy-seventh World Health Assembly, starting 27 May 2024, at which Member States are scheduled to consider the proposed text of the world’s first pandemic agreement for adoption,”  WHO’s statement said.

WHO’s statement includes a link to a draft of the Pandemic Agreement that INB9 was negotiating.  This version is labelled A/INB/9/3 and is dated 13 March 2024.

Related: WHO’s Pandemic Treaty negotiations are going very badly

In an article posted on Thursday, James Roguski highlighted some serious issues with a more recent version of WHO’s proposed Pandemic Agreement which is labelled A/INB/9R/3 and dated April 2024. 

His article titled ‘Bullsh*t’ includes a 5-minute video and written explanation of the issues in the latest draft, as well as a copy of the draft that can be downloaded.  You can find his article HERE.

Below we have picked up some of the issues Roguski has alerted us to and fleshed them out to give them some context.

Proposal for the WHO Pandemic Agreement (A/INB/9R/3)

The newly released draft of the proposed Pandemic Agreement begins: “The Parties to the WHO Pandemic Agreement … have agreed as follows …”

As defined in the draft, “Party” means a State or regional economic integration organisation that has consented to be bound by this Pandemic Agreement.

According to the draft Agreement, a “regional economic integration organisation” means “an organisation that is composed of several sovereign states and to which its Member States have transferred competence over a range of matters, including the authority to make decisions binding on its Member States in respect of those matters.”

Although it’s not stipulated which regional economic integration organisations WHO selects to participate in its decision-making – concurrently affecting the lives of people living in several countries – a list of regional economic integration organisations the United Nations collaborates with and supports includes:

  1. African Union (AU)
  2. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
  3. Arab League (AL)
  4. Arab Maghreb Union (AMU)
  5. Caribbean Community (CARICOM)
  6. Council of Europe (CoE)
  7. Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)
  8. European Union (EU)
  9. South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC)
  10. Shanghai Cooperation Organisation
  11. Asian-African Legal Consultative Organisation (AALCO)
  12. Union for the Mediterranean (UfM)
  13. Union of South American Nations (USAN)

Article 5

Article 5 of the draft is titled ‘One Health’.

The draft Agreement defines the One Health approach as an “integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems. It recognises that the health of humans, domestic and wild animals, plants and the wider environment (including ecosystems) is closely linked and interdependent.”

According to Article 5, the Parties that sign up to the draft pledge to promote a collaborative One Health approach to prevent and respond to pandemics, recognising the interconnectedness of people, animals, and the environment.

The Parties commit to addressing the root causes of pandemics and integrating interventions into pandemic prevention plans.

Each Party pledges to protect human, animal, and plant health by implementing national policies reflecting a One Health approach, involving communities in policy development and response, and promoting or establishing One Health joint training programs and continuing education programmes for human, animal and environmental health workforces.

Here’s the problem.  The Parties who sign this document pledge to go along with a One Health approach for which the details will be defined at a later stage and finalised up to two years after they sign it:

In other words, Parties that adopt this agreement in May are giving WHO carte blanche regarding people, domestic and wild animals, plants and the wider environment (including ecosystems).

Article 12 has the same problem. 

Article 12

Article 12 is titled ‘Access and benefit sharing’.  This article deals with the establishment of a “PABS system” to ensure rapid, systematic and timely sharing of PABS Material and Information.

The draft defines “PABS Material and Information” to mean “the biological material from a pathogen with pandemic potential, as well as sequence information relevant to the development of pandemic-related health products.”

And, a “pathogen with pandemic potential” is defined as “any pathogen that has been identified to infect a human and that is: novel (not yet characterised) or known (including a variant of a known pathogen), potentially highly transmissible and/or highly virulent with the potential to cause a public health emergency of international concern.”

According to Article 12, Parties who agree to the draft agree that WHO will coordinate and convene the PABS System.

The PABS System will be built upon the commitment of parties to share pathogens and their benefits equally, without stifling research and innovation. It will also be designed to complement the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework and adhere to biosafety, biosecurity and data protection standards. Intellectual property rights will not be sought on PABS materials and information.

The key components of WHO’s PABS System will include the rapid and systematic sharing of PABS materials and information, as well as the fair and timely sharing of benefits. During a pandemic, WHO will have access to 20% of safe and effective pandemic-related health products. Monetary contributions from PABS System users will be administered by WHO. A mechanism will be developed to allocate and distribute pandemic-related health products based on public health risks, needs, and demand.

The draft WHO Pandemic Agreement defines “pandemic-related health products” as “safe, effective, quality and affordable products that are needed for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, which may include, without limitation, diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines and personal protective equipment.”

Article 12 also states that laboratories in WHO’s network will be encouraged to involve scientists from developing countries in research projects related to PABS materials and information. Parties with manufacturing facilities for pandemic-related health products are expected to facilitate their export according to agreed timetables between WHO and manufacturers.

However, as with Article 5, the Parties who sign this document pledge to go along with WHO’s PAB System without knowing the specific details of what will be imposed on them:

Similarly, Article 6 also has gaping holes and presents problems regarding a lack of transparency and accountability.

Article 6

Article 6 has the title ‘Preparedness, readiness and health system resilience’. 

According to this Article, the Parties who sign the document agree to develop and maintain a resilient health system, with a focus on primary care, to prevent and respond to pandemics. Each Party will strengthen their health system functions and infrastructure, including providing timely and equitable access to quality healthcare during pandemics, with a particular focus on vulnerable populations.

They will also promote post-pandemic health system recovery, enhance laboratory and diagnostic capacities, and use social and behavioural sciences for pandemic prevention.

The Parties will collaborate with WHO to establish international data standards for sharing public health data.

Additionally, a monitoring and evaluation system “shall be developed, implemented and regularly assessed by WHO in partnership with relevant organisations, building on relevant tools, on a timeline to be agreed by the Conference of the Parties.”

The Conference of the Parties (“COP”) has not yet been established. It will be established with the adoption of the Pandemic Agreement.  Article 21 of the draft states: “A Conference of the Parties is hereby established.”

Usually, a COP is composed of representatives of the member states of a convention and accredited observers. 

There is no indication in the draft Pandemic Agreement of which representatives or observers, or how many, will make up the COP.  So Parties that sign the draft Pandemic Agreement are agreeing to implement a monitoring and evaluation system devised by unknown people in an unknown timeline.

To add insult to injury, the proposed Pandemic Agreement gives WHO, literally, an open chequebook. 

According to Article 21: “The Conference of the Parties shall by consensus adopt financial rules for itself as well as governing the funding of any subsidiary bodies it may establish as well as financial provisions governing the functioning of the Secretariat.”

And, “The Conference of the Parties may establish subsidiary bodies, as it deems necessary, and determine the terms and modalities of such bodies.”

#ExitTheWHO

Featured image: Image of Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus taken from ‘Robert Mugabe as WHO goodwill ambassador – what went wrong?’, The Conversation, 24 October 2017

Share this page to Telegram

Categories: Breaking News, World News

Tagged as:

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
25 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stuart-james.
Stuart-james.
25 days ago

Scam merchants!

Dave Owenhttps://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/for
Dave Owenhttps://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/for
Reply to  Stuart-james.
24 days ago

Hi Stuart-James,
How about this information.
https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=239389

Celeste Aida
Celeste Aida
24 days ago

Tedros MUST be CAUGHT as soon as possible and BURNT ALIVE !! That’s all I can write.

Some weeks ago I found out about MP-UK Andrew Bridgen’s comment on BIG BILLY: https://slaynews.com/news/top-uk-lawmaker-bill-gates-executed-crimes-against-humanity/ MP Andrew Bridgen was interviewed by Dr. Reiner Füllmich some months before Reiner was jailed though being COMPLETELY INNOCENT.
Below please find the most important part of my e-mail to MP-UK Andrew Bridgen which I transmitted to him after reading his article on slaynews: “”Since the beginning of the Covid hoax, I have been a very tough opponent to the initial “ coup-d’état-like” imprisonment of the entire nation of Italy” and the subsequent illegal measures and mandates. The first time I heard your name was in the transmission of your interview with Dr. Reiner Füllmich.

Apart from teaching, I am working as an activist in my free time and in particular fighting against child abuse and all the “nice” disgusting things shown in David Sorensen’s brilliant stopworldcontrol series, such as queerness and wokeness, Drag Queens, all the abominable transgender matter and puberty blockers etc. etc. In the socials, I am over-aggressive when it comes to saying what MUST BE SAID, and I call a spade a spade without the slightest hesitation.

I was very glad to read the above-mentioned article, and I immediately thought that after more than four years of being continuously threatened by the Cabal and distracted from their cruel deeds of darkness by all kinds of climate idiocies you can imagine and conflicts, wars, earthquakes (Turkey and Syria some time ago), monkey pox, aliens, UFOs, etc. it is high time, indeed, all of these tyrants were stopped immediately and, damn it to hell, for good!

Who elected them ?? NOBODY did !!
Who asked them or “allowed them” to interfere with our lives ?? NOBODY did !!
Who allowed them to undermine the sovereignties of our nations ?? NOBODY did !!
Who asked them to define the beginning and the end of an emergency in our countries ?? NOBODY did !!
Who asked them to impose on us “their special diet they have already chosen for their victims” ?? NOBODY did !!

If they wish so, they may feel free to chew their fresh, humming insects, and nobody will prevent them from swallowing these “delicious creatures”. They can also chew their fantastic chicle meat enriched with fresh spike proteins, nano particles, and graphene etc. and drink up all the expired doses of their elixir of mortality, a large amount of which are still around in all their “Frankenstein” vaccination hubs.

Thanks to Reiner’s ICIC, the Corona Committee, David Sorensen’s stopworldcontrol, Stew Peters’ “Died Suddenly”, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi’s insistent warnings, and the interventions of so many other lawyers, medical doctors, and scientists worldwide, the still sleeping sheep are gradually waking up and eventually starting to bleat against what is happening right now and what happened in our recent past and what and who is still menacing mankind.

On these grounds, I herewith would like to ask you to help drafting a steep petition making these terrorists shudder at least a tiny little bit and publishing a list of the cruellest and the most horrible perpetrators and, last but not least, insisting on their prompt condemnation after acknowledgement of their being found guilty and proceed to their subsequent and immediate executions. Setting a bombshell warning example hitherto unheard-of has been long overdue. The entire world and mankind have been hoaxed for too long and a large part of the worldwide population have stopped believing that bullshit. And since no-one seems to have dared to set so implicit an example so far, I consider it my absolute duty to do everything in my power in order to put my firm decision into action.

On top of all this, I would like to permit myself to express in no uncertain terms and absolutely unmistakably that any one living on this planet who has ever advocated the following torture measures: the unprecedented worldwide bio-weaponized genocide, the worldwide month-long incarcerations of entirely innocent and completely healthy peoples, the worldwide year-long deprivation of freedom and liberty, the worldwide inter-family and inter-friendships swaths of destruction, the worldwide health-damaging impositions of gag-laws, the worldwide dirty and poisoned tissue-muzzling of all peoples around the globe, be it toddlers, preschoolers, school-children, teenagers, youngsters, grown-ups, elderly people and poor handicapped creatures struggling against suffocation, the worldwide piss-take tests keeping the masses in the mantra bubble and in leading strings until recently, can rest assured that they will not be spared in any way, as true as I am sitting here to complete this draft. The cesspool of these criminal associations, corrupt organisations, and all the other riff-raff MUST be completely and definitely extinguished to their ashes. All these beast-like objects should not forget that they might stand against some billion people worldwide who might be more enraged than 100 trillion tigers, and in the worst case, they should be aware of what such a “furious pack of hounds” might mean to them. In the worst case, even lynch law could apply, should the opponents stir it up. More and more truth is being exposed day after day, a lot of people have woken up, and we are getting more and more from day to day, and sooner or later, most people of the world will no longer comply. They will no longer believe in climate hanky-panky, and the like. For all these reasons, I suppose these liars will not so easily prevent cows from mooing, goats from bleating, and any creatures, be it animals or human beings, from breathing or farting. NO WAY !!!! From now on, it will depend on us to fight in order to reconquer OUR world, our countries, our patriotism, our sovereignty and self-administration.””

Sorry for not being able to donate, but right now I am waiting to be recognised as a pensioneer. As it seems right now, I still have to survive on my last savings and some help from my family for another two years because the country where I have been living since October 2000 has raised pension age to 68, i.e. I will still have to wait for more than another 2 years to be allowed to be paid my pension.

Best regards to all expose staff and many thanks to all of you for your great job. Good luck to everybody.

Sabine

bluearea
bluearea
24 days ago

Trust me on the invisible, yea right, you lost all credibility

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  bluearea
24 days ago

Yep! Think the filth very much care about their credibility and how they appear to others.

So many awakening must be a real kick in the teeth to them. However, they’ve burned all their boats and have no choice but to carry on regardless.

Sheila Dunphy
Sheila Dunphy
24 days ago

This reminds me of the horrible Obamacare bill that we were told they must pass it before we could know what was in it???
So, if we allow them to continue to act like tyrants they will never stop until they depopulate billions of us useless eaters & put the rest into their 15 minute concentration camps?!?
But the big question is HOW do we stop the evil self appointed NWO Tyrants when they have spent decades to maybe a century putting their evil puppets into the highest positions in many governments, militaries, intelligence agencies, etc… worldwide???

Diane Leef
Diane Leef
Reply to  Sheila Dunphy
24 days ago

We have to quit feeding the beast. They are using our own money to kill us. We must quit paying them to destroy us.

Mrs D
Mrs D
Reply to  Diane Leef
24 days ago

Good point Diane, was thinking of mentioning the money suppliers in a comment soon.

Mike
Mike
24 days ago

This treaty should NEVER EVER be signed! Who in their right mind signs a contract without seeing, reading or understanding the content and detail of what it contains?
This MUST be thrown out by every country, all the members of WHO must be imprisoned or worse for crimes against humanity, premeditated murder, and for being charlatans! World health organisation? World HOMICIDE Organisation, more like! When they’re planning on killing 90% of the world population?

Diane Berwick
Diane Berwick
Reply to  Mike
23 days ago

My understanding from the off, is it’s an ‘opt out’ not opt in system, so automatic, hence why many top bods won’t get to see it, let alone scrutinise.

You're still not awake
You're still not awake
24 days ago

My health is of no concern to them. This is an abusive power grab and nothing else. They made it clear that they hate us.

Paul Watson
Paul Watson
24 days ago

Just tyrants being tyrants..

trackback
24 days ago

[…] Read more: Latest Pandemic Treaty draft has gaping holes because they daren’t reveal what they pla… […]

trackback
24 days ago

[…] Latest Pandemic Treaty draft has gaping holes because they daren’t reveal what they plan to do The latest draft of the Pandemic Treaty proposed by WHO’s Intergovernmental Negotiating Body is an admission of failure so significant that they are suggesting nations sign an incomplete document. “They know that they cannot show us the details of what they really want to do. So, they are proposing an incomplete, watered-down agreement in the hopes that they will be able to make decisions in the future; in the hopes that we won’t be paying attention,” James Roguski has concluded. […]

Dingle
Dingle
24 days ago

That cross-dressing Communist- Tedros needs the shove!

trackback
24 days ago

[…] Note: Dr. Nass gave her presentation before the latest draft was released, which we described in an article yesterday. […]

trackback
23 days ago

[…] Notă: Dr. Nass și-a făcut prezentarea înainte de lansarea celui mai recent proiect, pe care noi descris într-un articol de ieri. […]

trackback
23 days ago

[…] Note: Dr. Nass gave her presentation before the latest draft was released, which we described in an article yesterday. […]

trackback
23 days ago

[…] Remarque : Le Dr Nass a fait sa présentation avant la publication de la dernière version, que nous avons décrite dans un article hier . […]

trackback
22 days ago

[…] Note: Dr. Nass gave her presentation before the latest draft was released, which we described in an article yesterday. […]

honiaradaily
honiaradaily
21 days ago

Great

trackback
19 days ago

[…] Note: Dr. Nass gave her presentation before the latest draft was released, which we described in an article yesterday. […]

trackback
16 days ago

[…] Note: Dr. Nass gave her presentation before the latest draft was released, which we described in an article yesterday. […]