Breaking News

Fully Vaccinated are suffering far higher rates of infection than the Unvaccinated, and it is getting worse by the day; there is no justification for Vaccine Passports

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

IT’S OFFICIAL: Most of the UK’s vaccinated population are suffering far higher rates of infection than the unvaccinated, and it is getting worse by the day.


By Martin Zandstra


The UK’s Health Security Agency publishes detailed Covid statistics, which, for the last 7 weeks, have been tabulated by age-group and vaccination status. This now allows important questions to be answered.

The Agency says most vaccinated suffer substantially higher rates of infection, and their latest chart provides a snap-shot:

All of the UK’s 30-and-over vaccinated now endure far higher rates of infection than their unvaccinated counterparts. But as a snap-shot, this tells us nothing of how this arose, or how it may yet develop. Here we re-present the agency’s data in a time-series, to promote better understanding of the trends and implications.

The UK has vaccinated its population mostly in age order, from oldest to youngest, and very recently began vaccinating its under-18-year-old cohort. Being the UK’s most freshly vaccinated, they exhibit a very high degree of resistance to Covid infection: –

This very recently vaccinated cohort benefits from a 90% improvement in their infection rates, meaning their case incidence is 10 times better than that of their unvaccinated counterparts. This is impressive, and leads us to ask how long this high degree of protection might last?

The answer, unfortunately, seems to be not very long:

The previous UK age-group to be vaccinated was the 18–29-year-old cohort, of which half was fully vaccinated by some 9 weeks ago. While still doing better than the unvaccinated of their age, they have nevertheless lost the greater part of their relative resistance to infection. If they continue their trajectory, week 12 will see that benefit completely gone.

The earlier vaccinated age-group was the 30–39 cohort. Half was fully vaccinated around week 27, and by week 39 (again some 12 weeks later) had lost their enhanced infection resistance. For at least for these two cohorts, it would seem their vaccine induced resistance reduced to zero in under 3 months.

Unfortunately, it does not stop there; Following the data shows the vaccinated descend well into negative territory, which may prompt us to ask how all earlier vaccinated cohorts are now doing?

In terms of vulnerability to infection, the answer is not so well:

The entire 40-79 vaccinated cohort is deeply negative, now below minus 50%, meaning they suffer more than double the infection rate of their unvaccinated counterparts, and there is no obvious end in sight; Given the consistent and strongly negative continuing trend for all adult cohorts, it is impossible to guess where or when these trajectories might bottom out.

But does the trend result from increased vulnerability amongst the vaccinated, or is improved resistance developing amongst the unvaccinated? The answer appears to be both:

Unvaccinated adults are enjoying significantly lowered infection rates, but the vaccinated are very clearly headed in the opposite direction:

This begs the question: Why should the vaccinated suffer mounting infection rates, while case-rates of the unvaccinated both declined and are lower? Surely, we should expect the vaccinated to do better – certainly no worse?

Yet, for all but one adult cohort, the exact opposite is true, and even for them, it seems likely for not much longer:

It has been suggested infection amongst the unvaccinated has induced robust natural immunity leading towards their herd-immunity. That may well be a factor, but, as we have seen, the vaccinated have similarly been infected, and at least for the 40-79 cohort, at much higher rates. Why should this not benefit the vaccinated as well?

Are we to understand infection after vaccination may not produce similar broad immunity?

Vaccination is intended to alter subsequent immune response to infection, which is, of course, the whole point; It is conceivable this altered response may mute the development of broad long-lasting immunity that otherwise typically results from natural infection. That might then leave the vaccinated more open to re-infection, and might help explain these results. But this remains speculation, we simply do not know today.

What we do know from the UK data, is that anyone vaccinated more than few months ago is at greatly higher risk of Covid infection, and is therefore greatly more likely to be infected than their unvaccinated counterparts.

Much has been said and written to show the vaccinated are equally capable of transmitting Covid. But because their symptoms are often muted, they are also more likely to be out and about; add this to escalating infection rates, and there can be little doubt the vaccinated now constitute by far the greatest Covid transmission risk.

In light of this, vaccine passports are clearly senseless; They are nothing more than an invitation to infection, for which no justification can now possibly remain.



Data source: UK Health Security Agency COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Reports weeks 36-42:

Read UKHSA report here.

Infection rate data from the above:

Relative infection rates derived from UK Health Security Agency data:

Share this page to Telegram
5 6 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
47 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Meng
Meng
2 years ago

Nature shows us what Karma means.

The jabbers get what they deserve.

Following an Evil government is what their mistake is.

They will pay the price.

Lords Witnesses
Lords Witnesses
Reply to  Meng
2 years ago

Jesus said no rotten tree produces good fruit.

trackback
2 years ago

[…] October 25, 2021Fully Vaccinated are suffering far higher rates of infection than the Unvaccinated, and it is gettin… […]

John Wilson
John Wilson
2 years ago

The proportion of the vaccinated and unvaxed who are covid recovered must be broadly the same as the populations are so large. The unvaxed now have have better immunity ( if aged over 30) to covid than the vaxed. There can only be one explanation for this. The immune response to the covid virus of the vaxed has been damaged by having the vaccine.

An anecdote: I dance each week and go on dancing week-ends attended by about 1,000 people. 80% of us in my local dance group (about 40) have had covid in the last 6 weeks. 3 that I know of are unjabbed – one being me. I was one of the few not to be ill with covid recently. I had covid last March (better in a few days). I am aged 71.

The case rate for unjabbed in the under 18s is extraordinary – over 10 times that of my age group. Could it be that these children are being infected by particles exhaled by their recently jabbed school mates? They then test positive. Perhaps the jabbed are also getting ill but this is designated as being a reaction to the jab as opposed to an infection?

jack
jack
Reply to  John Wilson
2 years ago

“The case rate for unjabbed in the under 18s is extraordinary – over 10 times that of my age group. Could it be that these children are being infected by particles exhaled by their recently jabbed school mates?”

No, it means the gov is trying to coerce the under 18s into being poisoned by convincing them the under 18s are all catching ‘covid’.

You see the same thing in the other tables, where the gov is trying to convince the over 30s that the jabbed are losing their ‘protection’ over time and must therefore get ‘boosted’ to get it back.

Lead around by the nose …

Stevr
Stevr
Reply to  John Wilson
2 years ago

Yes the Unvaccinated are 85%+ Covid recoverd given the seroprevalence data. And mathematically that immunity must be better than vaccinated immunity or the case rates wouldn’t be lower. https://justguy.substack.com/p/what-does-unvaccinated-mean

phil
phil
2 years ago

Thanks for this well written evidence based article.

There is plenty of proof the experimental gene therapies are dangerous in other ways aside from the terrible consequences of compromising the immune system.

The problem is getting the branches of government responsible to acknowledge and debate the science and the evidence.

In a select committee on child vaccinations Chris Whitty was asked about the widespread criticism he and his department’s scientific method and approach was gathering. He said his preferred approach was to ignore it.

Alternative methods of talking scientific truth to power must be found when a person like Chris Whitty and Van Tham becom a blockage to it.

jack
jack
Reply to  phil
2 years ago

Still trying to convince your abusers to stop abusing you by talking at them? I wonder how many years of failure it’ll take before you finally give up.

The Hobbit
The Hobbit
Reply to  phil
2 years ago

I’m afraid that is trying to solve a political problem with a medical argument. The truth is irrelevant to the government – they have an agenda, and they are carrying it out in full knowledge that the covid story is a lie.

PatrioticDuty01
PatrioticDuty01
2 years ago

Hospitals in USA and in first world countries are refusing life-saving Ivermectin treatment even with court orders. Big Pharma doing everything they can to jab us no matter what, while alternative COVID cures EXIST! There happens to be heavy censorship who are looking for these treatments. The Research Is Clear: Ivermectin Is a Safe, Effective Treatment for COVID. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://health.p0l.org/

Last edited 2 years ago by PatrioticDuty01
@lienChrist\\
@lienChrist\\
2 years ago

No Green Pass – Opposing Digital Surveillance 
.
Political empires have disappeared from the world not because of your freedom struggles, but because globalists have found an easier way of keeping everyone enslaved, while giving you a superficial idea that you are a sovereign, independent, free person living in a true democracy.
For thousands of years human beings had been auctioned in the marketplace as slaves.
Although now that kind of slavery does not exist, if you look a little deeper it has only changed its form.
Now we are all digital slaves, living under full surveillance and for a lot less expense.
Yet tyranny is simply tyranny, it is murderous, it is criminal.
No tyranny has ever been able to remain forever, its days are limited.
Nobody can destroy people’s will.
They can harm people, they can kill them, but one day tyrants find that their very effort to keep their empire, and keep people enslaved, has turned the people against them.
How did such small groups of tyrants come to rule over your country, and the whole world.
Certainly there must have been a slave in everybody’s being.
So the real question is not to fight the people who have become your rulers.
The real question is to find within you the one who has become a slave.
Otherwise this seems to be an absolute impossibility.
Right ends can be achieved only through right means.
Through violence you cannot achieve a peaceful, silent, loving humanity.
The violence will be in the roots, it will poison your whole superstructure.
The priority should be your attainment of spiritual freedom, because political tyrannies will come and go.
And everybody down the ages who had the idea that “We will be free,” has been disappointed.
You cannot be absolutely sure that when you have overthrown one political tyranny, it will not be replaced by another.
It is unfortunate that society only introduces you to the world of the mind.
Only chaos follows as a shadow with the growth of the mind.
The society does not introduce you to meditation, because that is the only way to be absolutely certain that you will never go mad, that you will always remain master of your actions.
But there are reasons why the society is interested in the mind, and not in meditation.
The society’s whole interest is in how to exploit you, how to enslave you, how to use you in a more efficient way, almost like a slave machine.
It gives you all the education just for these hidden, secret aims.
It prevents you from knowing anything about meditation.
All organized societies, political and religious ideologies have been built on these false foundations of untruths.
The criminal politicians are always creating false narratives by repeating somebody else’s words, they have none of their own.
All their statements are within quotation marks.
All these politicians use very beautiful words, they are “helping save the planet,” “Building Back Better,” or “helping save humanity.”
Yet they are all criminals, because all that they do is non-essential.
They exploit the whole society in that they are un-creative, un-productive parasites.
These criminal politicians, howsoever articulate, learned or clever, will not be able to practice what they preach.
Always look at the politician rather than looking at their words, and you will see the disparity.
Why are politicians so afraid?
Because the seat of fear is in their own heart.
The whole world may be full of light, but deep inside they are all living in darkness.
Because they have forgotten their own reality, they are living with a false substitute, so all their actions become hypocritical.
Remember, real freedom is neither political, nor economical, nor social, the real freedom is spiritual.
Religiousness is not an experience that comes through thought, it is an awakening into thoughtless consciousness.
The perception of truth cannot happen in thought, it can happen only in the clear stream of thoughtless consciousness.
In fact, neither the mind nor anything of the mind is the pathway that leads to truth.
Truth exists where the mind has no access whatsoever.
As you go beyond the mind, you suddenly discover a sky that has no limits.
All tyrants and oppressors who hold the reins of administration face great danger if people develop their own pathways that lead to truth.
Then there is the possibility of revolution, as there is always the fear that people will begin to search for the truth.
Remember, the very spirit of rebellion needs no guidance.
It is a light unto itself.
Only the people who cannot rebel ask for guidance, want to be followers.
Their psychology is that to be a follower relieves them of all responsibility.
All that is needed of the follower is just to have faith.
And just to have faith is another name of spiritual slavery.
The rebel is the real spiritual being.
They do not belong to any herd, they do not belong to any system, they do not belong to any organization, they do not belong to any philosophy.
In simple, conclusive words, they do not borrow themselves from others.
Your body, your mind are all centered on a false self. 
But they dig deep within themselves and find their own life juices, finds their own life sources.
Unless we fill the world with these people, this world is only going to change from one tyranny to another.
It will be an exercise of utter futility.

carlo
carlo
2 years ago
please, post the link to access the tables. On the English government website I found the report but not the tables. Thanks
Not Today
Not Today
2 years ago

The PDF you supplied as evidence to back up your points says the exact opposite of what you are claiming here. You even picked out a graph showing the rates of vaccination and used it as evidence of the rate of covid among the vaccinated. Stop lying and spreading misinformation.

Miguel
Miguel
Reply to  Not Today
2 years ago

You are having reading comprehension issues. Page 17, Figure 2 clearly shows that case rates are higher for most vaccinated cohorts.

Capture.JPG
trackback
2 years ago

[…] Read the information and the charts at The Expose UK. […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] October 25, 2021Fully Vaccinated are suffering far higher rates of infection than the Unvaccinated, and it is gettin… […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] by Martin ZandstraThe Expose […]

Nikolaj
Nikolaj
2 years ago

Brilliant article with very illustrative figures. I don’t always agree with the way you interpret the math/stats put forward, but this is spot on IMO and very telling. Thank you from Denmark for the great work you are doing❤️

trackback
2 years ago

[…] ‘’Vaccination is intended to alter the subsequent immune response to infection, which is, of course, the whole point; It is conceivable this altered response may mute the development of broad long-lasting immunity that otherwise typically results from natural infection. That might then leave the vaccinated more open to re-infection and might help explain these results. But this remains speculation, and we simply do not know today.’’ The Expose reported. […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] help explain these results. But this remains speculation, and we simply do not know today.’’ The Expose […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] vacunas, pues ya tiene tres de cuatro mutaciones que necesitaría para ello. Además, según datos oficiales del Reino Unido (dónde la variante delta es preponderante), entre mayores de 29 años, la tasa […]

Stew Jeans
Stew Jeans
2 years ago

I’m feeling great I’m immune to bullshit too. No jab no mask no test still here…

trackback
2 years ago

[…] The Expose […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] ‘’Vaccination is intended to alter the subsequent immune response to infection, which is, of course, the whole point; It is conceivable this altered response may mute the development of broad long-lasting immunity that otherwise typically results from natural infection. That might then leave the vaccinated more open to re-infection and might help explain these results. But this remains speculation, and we simply do not know today.’’ The Expose reported. […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] Fully Vaccinated are suffering far higher rates of infection than the Unvaccinated, and it is gettin… […]

Mike
Mike
2 years ago

Plenty of reports on this, with real lab results… Old news. Same with new strains of cancers, the jabbed are experiencing a 20 TIMES, not % increase in cancers. Very wicked cancers…

Ken
Ken
2 years ago

Seems to point to the simple fact that the jab, which introduces only the spike proteins of the Alpha strain into the body and therefore, is the only thing the immune system is initially trained to respond against is limiting the response to any mutated (Delta) strain.

A person initially exposed to Delta would be immune to the whole virus, and have more robust immune response to any future strains. The jab trained the body to only recognize the spikes of the original strain and will not have much effect on future variants.

The fact that the Flu vaccines don’t work most of the time, is similar in that once a person gets a flu shot early in life (possibly before ever getting the flu), has an immune system that’s unprepared for future variants of the Flu.

Stevr
Stevr
2 years ago

It’s more complicated than this. The vast majority of the “Unvaccinated” cohort has had COVID and are immune. With better protection than vaccination. Even if an equal number of the vaccinated have also been naturally infected, it’s a much smaller percentage. This guy has the details justguy.substack.com

trackback
2 years ago

[…] Deze verkeerde toewijzing van de immuunbronnen van het lichaam , zoals we het zouden kunnen noemen, lijkt de ontwikkeling van het soort robuuste, langdurige immuniteit dat het gevolg is van een natuurlijke infectie te dempen. Dit is de reden waarom in het VK de “volledig gevaccineerde mensen veel meer besmettingspercentages hebben dan niet-gevaccineerden… […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] claims that half of reported COVID hospitalizations are unrelated to the virus.” According to The Daily Expose, “Fully Vaccinated are suffering far higher rates of infection than the Unvaccinated, and it is […]

Alea Erickson
Alea Erickson
2 years ago

My husband and I both got Covid. He died in hospital five days after I myself entered the hospital. I was in hospital for twelve days. We had not been vaccinated. After my hospitalization, I have been tested positive for antibodies on two blood immunity tests, yet I continue to hear I must be vaccinated. I refuse these vaccines since I believe the side effects to me could be dangerous. I have a hyperextended lung and have a handicap license form for my car. My energy level is low and just a trip to the store is exhausting. I am doing the best I can despite hearing news that I could be spreading a virus I have not had for months. I am not sick and I believe my immunity may be long lasting, perhaps lifetime. Nevertheless, people insist I must be separate. And so, despite losing my dear husband of 34 years, I am alone. I am doing the best I can with many friends and relatives who continue to support. God help us all!
I am concerned since the vaccine is nowplanned for young children aged 5 to 11. I believe this is a big mistake since they have little propensity to get this disease.

A Person
A Person
Reply to  Alea Erickson
2 years ago

It’s sad :(. I could be wrong but I wonder whether sitting out in the sunshine for half an hour a day with Covid would help patients get vitamin D. I guess hospitalised Covid people are in poor condition so they don’t do that but sitting in a hospital stops people getting out in the sun.

John Holzmann
John Holzmann
2 years ago

Very interesting article. I just wish you would deal with the data from the same report that shows the EMERGENCY CARE needs and DEATH RATES are far higher among the unvaccinated compared to the vaccinated. It might be helpful to find out how many hospitatlizations and emergency care needs are arising FROM the vaccines themselves (as opposed, solely, to the symptom group that is being called COVID-19). . . .