|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
The UK Government have released their thirty-second report highlighting adverse reactions to the Pfizer / BioNTech, Oxford / AstraZeneca, and Moderna Covid-19 injections.
The U.K. Governments report (which you can find here) has collated data inputted up to the 1st September 2021 via the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme. At this point an estimated 21.9 million first doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and 24.8 million first doses of the COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca had been administered, and around 18.1 million and 24.1 million second doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca respectively. An approximate 1.4 million first doses and approximately 0.9 million second doses of the COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna had also been administered.
As of the 1st September the MHRA had received 314,700 reports of adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab, and 820,923 reports of adverse reactions to the AstraZeneca jab. They also received 47,977 reports of adverse reactions to the Moderna jab and 3,244 reports where the brand of vaccinae was not specified.
This brings the total number of adverse reactions to the three available jabs to a truly shocking total of 1,186,844. This means that for every 69 people injected with the Pfizer jab an adverse reaction has been suffered, for every 30 people injected with the AstraZeneca jab an adverse reaction has been suffered, and for every 29 people injected with the Moderna jab an adverse reaction has been suffered.
However the MHRA states that only 1% – 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the Yellow Card scheme.
The MHRA also had this to say on the reported adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines in the first report released at the beginning of February 2021 –
A high proportion of people vaccinated in the vaccination campaign so far are very elderly, many of whom will also have pre-existing medical conditions. Older age and chronic underlying illnesses make it more likely that coincidental adverse events will occur, especially given the millions of people vaccinated. It is therefore important that we carefully review these reports to distinguish possible side effects from illness that would have occurred irrespective of vaccination.
But we assume that they’re hoping you’ve forgotten they’ve said that as the MHRA now admit in their report that –
Adverse reactions are reported less frequently in older adults (over 55 years) than in younger people.
The MHRA also state within their report that –
All vaccines and medicines have some side effects. These side effects need to be continuously balanced against the expected benefits in preventing illness.
If that really is the case why on earth have they given an experimental gene therapy with no long term safety data, and extremely concerning short term safety data (as you’ll see within our analysis), emergency use authorisation for use in children?
Have they not read the report on the extremely short and small clinical trial which found 86% of the children suffered an adverse reaction ranging from mild to extremely serious after just a single dose of the Pfizer jab? That same report also revealed that 1 in 9 children suffered a serious adverse reaction leaving them unable to perform daily activities.
Have they not seen the statistics which show children do not suffer serious disease if they are allegedly infected with the alleged Covid-19 virus?
If you’re thinking of allowing your child to have the experimental Pfizer mRNA “vaccine” then we’re sure you’ll change your mind after seeing the frightening adverse reactions that have been reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme.
We took a dive into the report and this is what we found…
(We used the data shown in the UK Governments Analysis Print of the Pfizer vaccine {which you can find here} + Analysis Print of the Oxford Vaccine {which you can find here} + Analysis Print of the Moderna Vaccine {which you can find here}.)
Are you aware that reports have been made to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme of people going blind after having the Pfizer jab? We doubt it.
Well we can confirm that as of the 1st September 2021 a total number of 101 people are now blind after having the Pfizer mRNA vaccine. As well as 270 people who have been left visually impaired, and 3 people who suffered sudden visual loss. In all there have been 5,236 eye disorders reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab.
There have also been 283 reports made of people suffering blindness, 736 reports of people left visually impaired, and 5 reports of sudden visual loss due to the AstraZeneca jab. The total number of eye disorders now standing at 13,818.
And 14 people have been left blind due to the Moderna jab, thats 1 in every 100,000 people that have received the Moderna jab so far.
You’re probably wondering how people could be going blind after taking a vaccine? Well one of the reasons is another extremely concerning adverse reaction that has been reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme a significant amount of times – a stroke.
This helpful fact sheet provided by the Stroke Foundation in Australia provides the answer as to why a stroke can cause blindness. According to the fact sheet around one-third of stroke survivors suffer visual loss, and most sadly never fully recover their vision.
The reason strokes cause blindness is that vision depends on a healthy eye to receive information and a healthy brain to process that information. The nerves in the eye travel from the eye through the brain to the occipital cortex at the back of the brain, allowing you to see
Most strokes affect one side of the brain. Nerves from each eye travel together in the brain, so both eyes are affected. If the right side of your brain is damaged, the left side vision in each eye may be affected. It is rare for both sides of the brain to be affected by stroke. When it does happen, it can result in blindness.
We can confirm that as of the 1st September 2021 there have been 329 cerebrovascular accidents resulting in 13 deaths, 41 cerebral haemorrhages resulting in 8 deaths, 33 ischaemic strokes resulting in 1 death, and 23 cerebral infarctions resulting in 1 death, all reported to the MHRA as adverse reactions to the Pfizer mRNA jab. But the list is much more extensive as you can see below…
However, the AstraZeneca jab because the list is much worse. There have been 1,182 cerebrovascular accidents resulting in 45 deaths, 167 cerebral haemorrhages also resulting in 45 deaths, 56 intracranial haemorrhages resulting in 14 deaths, and 41 haemorrhagic strokes resulting in 5 deaths, all reported to the MHRA as adverse reactions to the AstraZeneca vaccine as of the 1st September 2021.
Unfortunately, people are also going deaf after having the Pfizer jab. A total of 195 reports have been made to the MHRA of people suffering deafness as an adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab, as well as 35 reports of people suffering sudden hearing loss. The total number of ear disorders stands at 4,332.
There have been 367 reports made to the MHRA of people suffering deafness as a result of having the AstraZeneca jab, as well as 69 reports of people suffering sudden hearing loss. The total number of ear disorders stands at 9,752.
The Pfizer jab has also caused hundreds of people to suffer a seizure. There have been 495 reports of people suffering a seizure, 7 reports of people suffering a psychogenic seizure, 18 reports of people suffering a partial seizure, and 14 reports of people suffering febrile convulsion (a condition usually only seen in young children in the unvaccinated population).
The Pfizer jab has unfortunately also left people paralysed. There have been 107 reports of people suffering paralysis after having the Pfizer jab as of the 1st September 2021. But we must not forget that only 1% – 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported.
There have also been 10 reports of paralysis due to the Moderna jab alongside dozens of reports of partial paralysis.
We haven’t covered every single serious adverse reaction because if we did you probably wouldn’t finish reading the report before the next update was released. So finally we come to deaths.
There have been 1,632 deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines. This includes 16 deaths due to the Moderna jab and 24 deaths where the brand of vaccine was unspecified.
As well as 524 deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab.
And 1,064 deaths reported as adverse reactions to the AstraZeneca jab.
Now that you know this, will you allow your child to have an experimental Covid-19 injection once Chris Whitty gives the go ahead for them to be able to do so?
The Expose Urgently Needs Your Help…
Can you please help power The Expose’s honest, reliable, powerful journalism for the years to come…
Your Government & Big Tech organisations
such as Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
are trying to silence & shut down The Expose.
So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the
facts the mainstream refuse to…
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies & propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead, we rely solely on our support. So
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism
today. It’s secure, quick and easy…
Just choose your preferred method
to show your support below support
We are being heavily censored. Please share this article…
Categories: Breaking News, Did You Know?, The Expose Blog, World News
And the totally manhandled and pushed around Premier of NSW is threatening that she will have all “conspiracy theorists” people who refuse to risk life and limb by partaking of their vax programme with basically house arrest and denial of health care services. Exclusion from society. What a liberty.
[…] Covid-19 injections are still in trials and have so far caused a minimum of over 1.6 million injuries and over 1,600 deaths according to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme. Less than nine children under the age of 19 have died of […]
650,000+ Injuries Reported After COVID Vaccines, as Biden, FDA Spar Over Boosters
September 7, 2021
Megan Redshaw, Children’s Health Defense
Data released Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed that between Dec. 14, 2020 and Aug. 27, 2021, a total of 650,077 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 13,911 deaths — an increase of 284 over the number of deaths reported the previous week.
There were 85,971 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 1,505 compared with the previous week.
Excluding “foreign reports” filed in VAERS, 514,270 adverse events, including 6,296 deaths and 39,947 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020 and Aug. 27, 2021.
Of the 6,296 U.S. deaths reported as of Aug. 27, 13% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 18% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 32% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
In the U.S., 366.5 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of Aug. 27. This includes: 208 million doses of Pfizer, 145 million doses of Moderna and 14 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).
The data come directly from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.
Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.
This week’s U.S. data for 12- to 17-year-olds show:
· 18,523 total adverse events, including 1,091 rated as serious and 18 reported deaths. Two of the 18 deaths were suicides.
The most recent reported deaths include a 15-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 1498080) who previously had COVID, was diagnosed with cardiomyopathy in May 2021 and died four days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine on June 18, when he collapsed on the soccer field and went into ventricular tachycardia; and a 13-year-old girl (VAERS I.D. 1505250) who died after suffering a heart condition after receiving her first dose of Pfizer.
· Other deaths include two 13-year-old boys (VAERS I.D. 1406840 and 1431289) who died two days after receiving a Pfizer vaccine, a 13-year-old boy who died after receiving Moderna (VAERS I.D. 1463061), three 15-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1187918, 1382906 and 1242573), five 16-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1420630, 1466009, 1225942, 1475434, and 1386841) and three 17-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1199455, 1388042 and 1420762).
· 2,715 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds with 99% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
· 457 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation) with 450 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
· 97 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.
This week’s total U.S. VAERS data, from Dec. 14, 2020 to Aug. 27, 2021, for all age groups combined, show:
· 20% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
· 54% of those who died were male, 43% were female and the remaining death reports did not include gender of the deceased.
· The average age of death was 73.1.
· As of Aug. 27, 3,389 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 1008 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
· Of the 2,689 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 50% were attributed to Pfizer vaccinations, 43% to Moderna and 7% to J&J.
· 545 reports of Guillain-Barré Syndrome, with 39% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 34% to Moderna and 26% to J&J.
· 139,180 reports of anaphylaxis with 42% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine, 51% to Moderna and 7% to J&J.
· 8,751 reports of blood clotting disorders. Of those, 3,721 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 3,188 reports to Moderna and 1,794 reports to J&J.
· 2,242 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis with 1,411 cases attributed to Pfizer, 741 cases to Moderna and 83 cases to J&J’s COVID vaccine.
Two top FDA officials resign amid White House booster controversy
As The Defender reported Sept. 1, two of the FDA’s top vaccine officials announced they will leave the agency this fall, raising questions about the Biden administration and the way it sidelined the agency.
According to an email sent Aug. 31 by Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, to staff members, Dr. Marion Gruber, director of the FDA’s vaccines office, will quit at the end of October, and her deputy, Dr. Philip Krause, will leave in November.
Gruber and Krause were upset about the Biden administration’s recent announcement that adults should get a COVID booster eight months after they received a second shot, people familiar with the decision told The New York Times.
Neither believed there was enough data to justify offering booster shots yet, the sources said, and both viewed the announcement, amplified by Biden, as pressure on the FDA to quickly authorize them.
U.S. health regulators also said there isn’t enough data to recommend boosters for the general population, yet the White House has moved forward with its plan to offer a third dose of Pfizer or Moderna by the week of Sept. 20 — even though that plan requires authorization from the FDA and CDC first.
FDA advisory committee to hold meeting on COVID vaccine boosters, days before White House scheduled the roll-out to begin
The FDA announced its Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee will hold a virtual advisory meeting Sept. 17, to discuss Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID application for boosters — just days before the shots are to become available to the general population.
The committee’s director, Dr. Peter Marks, said “a transparent, thorough and objective review of the data by the FDA is critical so that the medical community and the public continue to have confidence in the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines.”
The FDA plans to livestream the meeting on the agency’s YouTube channel. The meeting also will be webcast from the FDA website.
Moments before the FDA released the announcement, Moderna said it had submitted an application to offer booster doses of its COVID vaccine, CNN reported.
According to CDC data, 955,000 Americans have already received additional vaccine doses, though it’s unclear how many of those were technically authorized.
CDC endorses full approval for Pfizer and BioNTech’s COVID vaccine
An advisory panel to the CDC last week unanimously endorsed the FDA’s full approval of the Pfizer and BioNTech COVID vaccine for people 16 years and older, and the CDC immediately adopted the committee’s recommendation.
The endorsement by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices came after the FDA on Aug. 23 granted full approval to Pfizer’s “mRNA vaccine, which is being marketed as Comirnaty.
The CDC statement made no mention of the Comirnaty brand, but referred to Pfizer-BioNTech’s “licensed” vaccine — even though the FDA approval was limited specifically to the drugmaker’s Comirnaty vaccine.
UK panel does not recommend COVID vaccines for healthy children 12 to 15 years old
Britain’s vaccine advisers said they would not recommend vaccination of healthy 12- to 15-year-olds against COVID, preferring a precautionary approach due to the potential for vaccinated teens to develop heart inflammation, Reuters reported.
The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation also said children were at such a low risk from the virus that vaccines would offer only a marginal benefit.
The British government said it would consult medical advisers to look at other factors before making a final decision. The UK’s four chief medical officers have been asked to consider the wider impact on schools and society.
The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation did advise widening the existing vaccine program to include an extra 200,000 teenagers with specific underlying conditions, including chronic heart, lung and liver conditions that put those teens at much higher risk of COVID than healthy children.
More than 100 Ontario youth sent to hospital for vaccine-related heart problems
A report released last week by Public Health Ontario showed the incidence of heart inflammation following mRNA vaccination was significantly more prevalent in young people.
As of Aug. 7, there were 106 incidents of myocarditis and pericarditis in people under the age of 25 in Ontario — slightly more than half of the total of all such incidents. Thirty-one cases occurred in the 12- to 17-year age group and 75 cases in 18- to 24-year-olds. Eighty percent of all cases were in males.
According to the report, the rate of heart inflammation was higher following the second dose of an mRNA vaccine, particularly for those receiving the Moderna vaccine as the second dose of the series, regardless of the product used for the first dose.
Public Health Ontario added the reporting rate for heart inflammation in those 18 to 24 was seven times higher with Moderna than with Pfizer. Pfizer is currently the only vaccine authorized for use in 12- to 17-year-olds in Ontario.
Largest observational study shows natural immunity is better than vaccine-induced immunity
According to a new study comparing natural immunity gained through previous SARS-CoV-2 infection to vaccine-induced immunity afforded by the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, people with natural immunity had longer lasting and stronger protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization from the Delta variant.
The study, published Aug. 25 on medRxiv, is the largest observational study to date and used data from Israel –– one of the most highly vaccinated countries in the world.
Researchers examined medical records of 673,676 Israelis 16 years and older — charting their infections, symptoms and hospitalizations between June 1 and Aug. 14, when the Delta variant predominated in Israel.
The study found in two analyses that people who had never been infected with SARS-CoV-2 but were vaccinated in January and February were six to 13 times more likely to experience breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to unvaccinated people who were previously infected with SARS-CoV-2.
Researchers also found a significantly increased risk of asymptomatic disease in those who had been vaccinated.
Woman experiences rapid onset of rare brain disease after second Pfizer shot, dies within three months
Cheryl Cohen (VAERS ID 1535217), a healthy 64-year-old woman from Florida, died three months after her second dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine from sudden-onset Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD), a rare, degenerative and fatal brain disorder she developed soon after she was vaccinated.
In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Gianni Cohen said her mother experienced her first episode indicating something was neurologically wrong with her 11 days after her second Pfizer dose. Her initial symptoms included severe headaches, mass confusion and brain fog.
After being hospitalized for 10 days, Cohen returned home where her symptoms progressed and her condition rapidly deteriorated. On June 19, Cohen was hospitalized again for a severe headache, after which she was diagnosed with CJD. She died July 22.
Cohen’s medical team said the onset of CJD could be tied to the COVID vaccine. Dr. Andrea Folds, one of the internal medicine physicians from Aventura Hospital who oversaw Cohen’s case, wrote a case report. The report, submitted Sept. 2 to American College of Physicians Journal, is awaiting approval for publication.
WHO says it’s monitoring a new COVID variant called “MU”
The World Health Organization (WHO) is monitoring a new COVID variant called “mu,” which the agency says has mutations that have the potential to evade immunity provided by a previous COVID infection or vaccination, CNBC reported.
Mu — known by scientists as B.1.621 — was added to the WHO’s list of variants “of interest” on Aug. 30, the international health organization said in its weekly COVID epidemiological report published late Tuesday.
The variant contains genetic mutations that indicate natural immunity, current vaccines or monoclonal antibody treatments may not work as well against it as they do against the original ancestral virus, the WHO said.
The mu strain needs further study to confirm whether it will prove to be more contagious, more deadly, or more resistant to current vaccines and treatments.
183 days and counting, CDC ignores The Defender’s inquiries
According to the CDC website, “the CDC follows up on any report of death to request additional information and learn more about what occurred and to determine whether the death was a result of the vaccine or unrelated.”
On March 8, The Defender contacted the CDC with a written list of questions about reported deaths and injuries related to COVID vaccines. We have made repeated attempts, by phone and email, to obtain a response to our questions.
Despite multiple phone and email communications with many people at the CDC, and despite being told that our request was in the system and that someone would respond, we have not yet received answers to any of the questions we submitted. It has been 183 days since we sent our first email to the CDC requesting information.
Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.
About the Author
Megan Redshaw is a freelance reporter for The Defender. She has a background in political science, a law degree and extensive training in natural health.
Me: And then there are the Euro vaccines database, which is usually a lot worse than VAERS, which I don’t currently have, bearing in mind that these numbers are beleived to be up to 10% worse, because the medical profession is under the hammer to not report cases, because they could lose their license to practice, if they do
Articulate Nurse Dealing With COVID Hospitalization Gives Honest Insight About What Really is Happening – Alarming Secondary Confirmation of Details Provided and Cited
September 11, 2021
A discussion between Stew Peters and a hospital nurse who has direct contact with COVID patients and all aspects of COVID treatment is a must watch. Really, this gets better as the discussion gets more detailed. WATCH
.This is not random speculation or an anecdotal claim. To further support the real-world outline explained by the nurse, CTH has received some very specific details from inside the medical system where board certifications are determined. What follows below is not connected to the discussion above; however, specific leaked documents provided to CTH support what that nurse is saying.
Doctors in general, and pediatric doctors specifically, are being told by licensing boards & regulatory agencies tied to the political systems of healthcare – that medical providers board certification and licensing could be in jeopardy if they are found to be discussing negative vaccine outcomes and/or contradictory issues about COVID-19 treatment in non private settings.
Meaning, if doctors speak publicly they are putting their license at risk. Below is a copy of the WARNING LETTER.
If the vaccines were not generating statistically significant negative outcomes, this type of letter would not be needed. For whatever reason, the medical boards need to stop doctors and healthcare providers from explaining what is happening in the real world.
The medical system claims that surround the COVID-19 story are tenuously being held in place by bureaucratic systems and political agents within the regulatory bodies. As you can see above they view honest public discussion as a risk to their position.
Think about it from a common sense perspective…. If the claims behind COVID-19, and the variants as an example, where honest and genuine; and if the benefits of the vaccine were true as claimed; the medical establishment would not need to threaten doctors, and they would not view sunlight as a risk to their objective.
Why would any honestly constructed institution need to threaten voices within that system against discussion of every day events as they take place?
These are beyond RED FLAGS !!
The Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), which supports its member state medical licensing boards, has recently issued a statement saying that providing misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine contradicts physicians’ ethical and professional responsibilities, and therefore may subject a physician to disciplinary actions, including suspension or revocation of their medical license. We at the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM), the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), and the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) support FSMB’s position. We also want all physicians certified by our Boards to know that such unethical or unprofessional conduct may prompt their respective Board to take action that could put their certification at risk.
Expertise matters, and board-certified physicians have demonstrated that they have stayed current in their field. Spreading misinformation or falsehoods to the public during a time of a public health emergency goes against everything our Boards and our community of board-certified physicians stand for. The evidence that we have safe, effective and widely available vaccines against COVID-19 is overwhelming. We are particularly concerned about physicians who use their authority to denigrate vaccination at a time when vaccines continue to demonstrate excellent effectiveness against severe illness, hospitalization and death.
We all look to board-certified physicians to provide outstanding care and guidance; providing misinformation about a lethal disease is unethical, unprofessional and dangerous. In times of medical emergency, the community of expert physicians committed to science and evidence collectively shares a responsibility for giving the public the most accurate and timely health information available, so they can make decisions that work best for themselves and their families.
Warren Newton, MD, MPH
President and CEO
American Board of Family Medicine
Richard J. Baron, MD
President and CEO
American Board of Internal Medicine
David G. Nichols, MD, MBA
President and CEO
American Board of Pediatrics
Besides Fetal Deaths, Breastfeeding Babies are Dying and becoming Sick following Mothers’ COVID Shots
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Back in April this year we published a video commentary by ReallyGraceful where she reported that many mothers who were nursing their babies had their breast milk dry up after taking a COVID shot.
As more and more data is entered into the government Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), we are now seeing cases where babies that are breastfed are suffering adverse reactions to the COVID shots that their mothers are taking. The shots have not yet been authorized for infants, although such an authorization is expected any day now.
Celeste McGovern of LifeSite News reported on one case where the breastfeeding baby died with blood clots, something rarely ever seen in infants, but a common side effect we are seeing with people who take the COVID shots, blood clots which the CDC states are “rare” in spite of the data in VAERS that shows over 10,000 cases of “thrombosis”, including 488 deaths.
VAERS report ID 1532154 was apparently filed by the mother, a 36-year-old woman from New Mexico:
On July 17, my baby passed away.
I had been breastfeeding my 6 week old baby at the time that I received the first Pfizer vaccine on June 4, 2021.
He became very sick with a high fever about 2 weeks after I got the first Pfizer vaccine on June 21. He was treated for 2 weeks with IV antibiotics for a supposed bacterial infection.
However, they never found any specific bacteria, and called his diagnosis culture-negative sepsis. At the end of his hospital stay he tested positive for rhinovirus.
After the 14 day course of antibiotics, he was home for one week, but exhibited strange symptoms (e.g. swollen eyelid, strange rashes, vomiting).
I took him back to the hospital on July 15, where he presented with what they called an atypical Kawasaki disease.
He passed away shortly thereafter from clots in his severely inflamed arteries.
I am curious if the spike protein could have gone through the breast milk and caused an inflammatory response in my child.
They say Kawasaki disease presents very similarly to the Multi-System Inflammatory Syndrome in children that they are seeing in post Covid infections. (My baby also had unusual birth circumstances, as he was born at 37 weeks, triggered by a maternal appendicitis.)
However, if they know that antibodies go through the breastmilk as a good thing, then why wouldn”t the spike protein also go through the breastmilk and potentially cause problems. (Source.)
I ran a search in the VAERS database to see how many other reports have been filed with mothers who are breastfeeding babies, and came up with 94 cases, which included one other infant death. (Source.)
The other breastfeeding infant death is VAERS case 1166062 which lists Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura as one of the symptoms. Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura is a rare blood disorder in which blood clots form in small blood vessels throughout the body.
Patient received second dose of Pfizer vaccine on March 17, 2020 while at work. March 18, 2020 her 5 month old breastfed infant developed a rash and within 24 hours was inconsolable, refusing to eat, and developed a fever.
Patient brought baby to local ER where assessments were performed, blood analysis revealed elevated liver enzymes. Infant was hospitalized but continued to decline and passed away.
Diagnosis of TTP. No known allergies. No new exposures aside from the mother”s vaccination the previous day. (Source.)
Here are a few more cases in VAERS where the COVID shot given to the breastfeeding mother apparently also affected the baby. Some of the cases of breastfeeding mothers getting the COVID shot report reduced milk flow, green milk, mastitis, thrombophlebitis in the breast, heavy menstruations even though breastfeeding, etc.
I am only including some of the cases here that affected the baby who was breastfeeding, and who did NOT get the shots but apparently had side effects from drinking the breast milk from their mothers who got the shots.
30-Year-Old Connecticut Breastfeeding Mother with 5-month-old son – Vomiting, Diarrhea, Body Rash, and Hematuria
VAERS case 970309: Patient is breastfeeding her 5 month old son. Two nights after her 1st Moderna dose, he had violent vomiting, diarrhea, body rash, and hematuria (blood in urine).
36-Year-Old California Breastfeeding Mother – Hives
VAERS case 999040 (Pfizer): Breastfed son have severe hives x5days.
31-Year-Old California Breastfeeding Mother with 4-month-old-son – Diarrhea
VAERS case 1070803 (Pfizer): I was exclusively breastfeeding at the time of receiving both doses. My 4 month old son developed diarrhea on February 1st and it lasted 2 weeks. Lab work/stool studies were negative for any bacterial or viral infections.
38-Year-Old New Jersey Breastfeeding Mother with 3-month-old daughter – Skin Rash
VAERS case 1111787 (Pfizer): I am breastfeeding my daughter exclusively. She was born December 9, 2020. She is roughly 3 months old. She had an all body rash.
35-Year-Old Alaska Breastfeeding Mother with 12-month-old infant – Anaphylaxis shock
VAERS case 1119088 (Pfizer): Patient received 1st in series covid vaccine at approximately 915… she breastfed her 12 month-old infant shortly thereafter without problem. around 1215 baby was getting fussy and breastfed for about 5 minutes before baby broke out in hives.
EMS was called and epinephrine/diphenhydramine administered for course cough/wheezing, presumably anaphylaxis.
Other foods consumed by baby on same day included banana, kids fig newton bar, dried apples, meat from frozen meal, and two piece of cereal (new to baby). ER course required 4 hours of monitoring but no other medical interventions.
Infant Breastfeeding Boy in Alaska – Anaphylaxis shock
VAERS case 1124474 (Pfizer): MOTHER OF 12 MONTH OLD BOY RECEIVED FIRST DOSE OF COVID 19 VACCINE AT 9:15 AM SHE BREASTFED HER 12 MONTH OLD SON 3 HOURS LATER AND WHILE BREASTFEEDING THE CHILD DEVELOPED ACUTE ANAPHYLAXIS. TO BE CLEAR: MOTHER HAD THE VACCINE AND THE CHILD HAD THE REACTION
34-Year-Old California Breastfeeding Mother with 11-Week-Old infant boy – Appetite decrease, Vomiting
VAERS case 1139952 (Moderna): Breastfeeding exclusively an 11 week old infant boy. I have no adverse effects other than sore arm but within 24 hrs baby appetite decreased and vomited once so far.
40-Year-Old Breastfeeding Mother with 1-Month-Old Infant – Diarrhea for 36 hours
VAERS case 1144429 (Pfizer): I am breastfeeding and the day after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID19 vaccine and breastfeeding that day, my one month old had diarrhea for approximately 36 hours. There were no other changes to diet. Approximately 14 hours prior to the diarrhea I had one dose of tylenol to help with the aches from the vaccine reaction.
29-Year-Old New Jersey Breastfeeding Mother with 15-Month-Old child – Ear infection, fever
VAERS case 1149144 (Moderna): The patient who received the vaccine was a breastfeeding mother. Her 15-month-old developed an ear infection, requiring antibiotics for the first time ever, within 72 hours of the vaccine administration.
Her 15-month-old developed a fever of 102.6 approximately 6 days after the vaccine was administered. He then was prescribed antibiotics 7 full days after the vaccine was administered to the mother.
31-Year-Old Illinois Breastfeeding Mother with 10-month-old son – Persistent Fever of 100 – 103 F.
VAERS case 1168528 (Moderna): The patient is breast-feeding her 10 month old son, and the child developed a persistent fever of 100 – 103 F. starting 12-24 hours after vaccination and still persisting on day #4 after vaccination.
34-Year-Old Indiana Breastfeeding Mother with son – Skin rash
VAERS case 1205906 (JANSSEN): Became tired around 8pm, followed by chills, fever 101.8, sweats(taken around 12:30am), weakness, joint pain, and nausea. The fever and chills lasted around 5 hours. The following day I was weak in my hands and joints were sore. I am a breastfeeding mom and my son broke out in a rash the following day.
30-Year-Old Indiana Breastfeeding Mother with son – Rash spread from his stomach to his entire body
VAERS case 1229118 (Pfizer): I was diagnosed with shingles on 3-18-21. I started having a rash on 3-15-21. I have been prescribed medication that I just started. I am breastfeeding and my son developed a rash on 3-15-21. The rash spread from his stomach to his entire body.
The rash turned bright red and bumps were visible on his entire body. The redness decreased starting on 3-17-21. He was seen by a doctor on 3-19-21 and told it is a viral rash likely from the vaccine but nothing can be done.
28-Year-Old Indiana Breastfeeding Mother with 9.5-month-old son – Fever, Abnormal feces
VAERS case 1242964 (Moderna): I am currently *breastfeeding* a male baby who was 9.5mo old at time of *my* vaccine.
That afternoon he took an unusually long nap, was unusually cranky and lethargic during the day; and by evening had a 100.7*F fever.
He slept through the night (skipping his nightly feed–this has only ever happened three times since birth so very uncommon) and was still cranky and tired/sleepy the next day. His fever broke about 30hrs after onset.
He has since had a significant change in wet/dirty diapers– his total, daily wet diapers have decreased and his dirty diapers have gone from semi-solid stool to very wet, more explosive, and incredibly grainy/gritty ever since (it”s been a week and a half now since my dose). I have continued to breastfeed during this whole time.
37-year-Old New Jersey Breastfeeding Mother with 3-month-old baby – Diarrhea
VAERS case 1258446 (Pfizer): Breastfeeding 3 month old baby had loose stools for one week after receiving 2nd Pfizer shot.
33-Year-Old New York Breastfeeding Mother with infant – Projectile vomiting
VAERS case 1262437 (Pfizer): Breastfeeding infant developed projectile vomiting for hours. Went to urgent card who said other breastfeeding mothers were there with sick infants with similar symptoms few days after getting vaccinated.
27-Year-Old New York Breastfeeding Mother with 8-week-old infant – Fever
VAERS case 1275035 (Moderna): Breastfeeding 8 week old baby had a fever one day after maternal vaccination.
25-Year-Old Florida Breastfeeding Mother with daughter – Fever, diarrhea
VAERS case 1277155 (Moderna): I’m Breastfeeding and at 7:15pm my daughter started developing a fever. She felt warm to the touch. Her forehead temperature was 99.7F.
She has since had diarrhea and has been acting very clingy and nursing around the clock. Still going on at 7:11am 05/1/2021
35-Year-Old Breastfeeding Mother with 14-month-old – Diarrhea
VAERS case 1298064 (Moderna): I”m breastfeeding my 14-month old 3x a day. She had mild diarrhea and mild stomach upset on 5/6 and 5/7. Ruled out no change in diet. Diarrhea is not common for her.
30-Year-Old California Breastfeeding Mother with 22-month-old daughter – Fever, irritable
VAERS case 1324020 (Pfizer): About ten days after the vaccine I started to have intense cramping and I lost a blood clot. My belly was tightening up and I started to feel downward pressure. I also had back pain. I was checked out at the hospital, and they did not find anything wrong. I was 23 weeks pregnant at the time. I have not had any more cramping.
I am also breast feeding my toddler and she was cranky and out of sorts after each dose of the vaccine. She was really irritable and she was running a low grade fever. My daughter is 22 months old. Pregnancy-second
32-Year-Old Breastfeeding Mother with 7-week-old baby – Lethargic, increased spitting up
VAERS case 1334516 (Pfizer): Aches and chills beginning 10-12 hours post dose. Also some weakness and fatigue. Persisted for about 24 hours. Moderately managed with acetaminophen (500 mg Q 6 hrs). Patient is breastfeeding; her 7 week old baby was somewhat lethargic and had significantly increased frequency and volume of spit up during the same 24 hour window, but did not appear to be uncomfortable.
31-Year-Old North Carolina Breastfeeding Mother with 2-month-old infant – Blood clot, dark stools
VAERS case 1347789 (Pfizer): This individual has a 2 month old infant and was breast feeding at time of administration of both Pfizer covid19 vaccines.
Four days after the first vaccine, individual noticed a blood tinged clot-like spit up in infant and then dark stool from infant one day later.
Two days after the second vaccine, mom noticed a blood-clot-like drainage from nipple (that individual says looked just like the blood tinged spit-up that was noticed in infant).
32-Year-Old Texas Breastfeeding Mother with 4-week-old infant – Fever, nasal congestion, loss of appetite
VAERS case 1443445 (Pfizer): I’m currently nursing. My son was only 4 weeks old and experienced a fever of 101? around 12am 6/12/2021 and fever wouldn’t lower even with Tylenol. He also had nasal congestion and wouldn’t eat. He was taken into Hospital the same day but no source to the fever etc. was found.
37-Year-Old Texas Breastfeeding Mother with 10-month-old daughter – Hives on face and body
VAERS case 1592542 (Moderna): Within 10 minutes of receiving the vaccine, I felt that I was going to pass out. I had to sit down on the floor in pharmacy. Within the next few hours, I experienced mild chest pain , mild to moderate head ache, and flu like symptoms. In addition, most of the left side of my face went numb like Bell’s palsy (forehead, cheek, lips and tongue on the left). I got the vaccine on a Tuesday.
On Wednesday and Thursday my 10 month old breastfed baby started experiencing hives on her face and body. Her ears were red on the tips. Her hands and fingers were red and swollen hot to the touch. I took her to urgent care where she got an oral steroid. She tested negative for any respiratory virus. It is now a few weeks later and I still have a spot on the left side of my lips with no feeling. I am experiencing extreme fatigue where it is difficult to stay awake throughout the whole day.
The CDC continues to state that blood clots are “rare” following COVID-19 injections, and yet if blood clots for infants are already extremely rare without breastfeeding mothers receiving a COVID-19 shot, and here we now have several cases, including two deaths, in a short period of time (about 9 months) in a system (VAERS) that we know is vastly under-reported since there is pressure put on nurses and healthcare workers NOT to report COVID-19 adverse events (source), then it is criminal to not report this to the public, and to not warn pregnant and nursing mothers about these dangers.
By way of contrast, I searched for adverse reactions with breastfeeding mothers for the previous 5 years prior to the COVID-19 shots, and in 5 years only 5 cases were reported to VAERS of negative reactions of breastfeeding mothers in their babies, with ZERO deaths, after ALL non-COVID vaccines. (Source.)
Source.
There have also now been 1,490 recorded fetal deaths following COVID-19 injections of pregnant women for the past 9 months.
By way of contrast, I searched for fetal deaths following ALL vaccines for the past 5 years before COVID injections were authorized in December 2020, and there were a total of 398 fetal deaths following all vaccinations for the past 5 years (minus one month – December 2020). (Source.)
That’s an average of 7 deaths per month pre-COVID, and 165 deaths per month following COVID shots. 25 X more fetal deaths following COVID shots than fetal deaths following all vaccines for the past 5 years.
Me: Had the vaccines – Do Not breastfeed you kids!!
Biden to Lay Out 6-Prong Plan for More COVID Vaccine Mandates and Restrictions Targeting Unvaccinated
President Biden is expected to announce today he will impose new vaccination mandates as part of a plan to “return to normal.” When asked if the plan would have an immediate and broad effect on Americans, the White House told reporters: “It depends on if you’re vaccinated or not.”
By
Megan Redshaw
President Biden is expected to announce later today he will impose new vaccine mandates as part of a broad plan to put pressure on private businesses, federal agencies and schools to enact stricter vaccination and testing policies.
According to The New York Times, Biden, who was briefed by his team of COVID advisors Wednesday, will address six areas where his administration can push eligible Americans to receive vaccines.
Two officials familiar with the plan said it would include new federal requirements for vaccination, and that its underlying message would be that the only way to return to some sense of normalcy is to get as many people vaccinated as possible.
A White House official said the six pillars Biden will discuss include:
1. Vaccinating the unvaccinated
2. Furthering protection for the vaccinated
3. Keeping schools safely open
4. Increasing testing and requiring masking
5. Protecting our economic recovery
6. Improving care for those with COVID
Biden also will announce new measures for kids in classroom settings.
When asked if Biden will add more detail to existing policies or would outline measures that would have an immediate and broad effect on Americans, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki told reporters: “It depends on if you’re vaccinated or not.”
“He’s going to outline the next phase in the fight against the virus and what that looks like, including measures to work with the public and private sector, building on the steps we’ve already announced, the steps we’ve taken over the last few months: requiring more vaccinations, boosting important testing measures and more; making it safer for kids to go to school all at a time when the American people are listening,” Psaki said.
In an interview with MSNBC ahead of Biden’s remarks on Thursday, Psaki said Biden really wants to lay out the path ahead.
“He’s going to speak directly to vaccinated people and their frustration, and he wants them to hear how we’re going to build on what we’ve done to date to get the virus under control and to return to some version of normal in this country,” Psaki said.
Just over 53% of Americans are fully vaccinated, including almost two-thirds of the adult population, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Biden to require federal workers to get vaccinated, removes testing options
As part of his six-pronged strategy to boost vaccination Biden is expected to sign two executive orders requiring all federal executive branch employees and contractors be vaccinated against COVID — with no option for weekly testing for the unvaccinated as previously promised — three people familiar with the plan told CBS News.
As The Defender reported July 30, Biden announced all civilian federal employees and contractors would be required to show proof of vaccination against COVID, or submit to regular COVID testing, wear masks and socially distance.
In response to the news Biden would be issuing more mandates and restrictions on the unvaccinated, Mary Holland, Children’s Health Defense president and general counsel, told The Defender:
“The press anticipating President Biden’s speech suggests an utter and complete disavowal of the informed consent ethic for which the United States led the way in the Nuremberg Code at the end of World War II: the consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
“Note the word ‘absolutely’ there must be informed consent. Full stop. President Biden’s efforts to coerce federal workers and those who have elected to remain unvaccinated is clearly in violation of the Nuremberg Code, which has been incorporated into U.S. federal and state law. This is a sad day for ethics and the rule of law.”
Biden is scheduled to deliver remarks at 5 p.m. Eastern time.
United Airlines allows religious exemptions to mandates, but will place workers on unpaid leave
United Airlines told staff on Wednesday those who are granted religious exemptions to COVID vaccines will be placed on temporary unpaid medical leave, CNBC reported.
In August, United became the first major U.S. airline to issue a vaccine mandate for its employees. Employees have until Sept. 27 to get fully vaccinated or will face termination.
“We have no greater responsibility to you and your colleagues than to ensure your safety when you’re at work, and the facts are crystal clear: Everyone is safer when everyone is vaccinated,” United CEO Scott Kirby and President Brett Hart said to employees in a memo obtained last month by The Hill.
Employees, such as such as pilots, flight attendants and gate agents, who directly interact with customers and are granted an exemption will be permitted to return to work “once the pandemic meaningfully recedes,” United reportedly said, though the airline did not specify a timeline or lay out criteria for what “meaningfully recedes” looks like.
Mechanics and dispatchers who are also given exemptions may return to work once United implements new testing procedures and other mitigation measures, according to CNBC.
Airlines’ approaches to encourage vaccination rates of their staff have varied. Delta Air Lines is imposing a $200 surcharge on unvaccinated employees’ company healthcare premiums, and Delta, American Airlines and Alaska Airlines will end pay protections for unvaccinated employees who contract or are exposed to COVID.
CDC, UK Government & Oxford University find the Covid-19 Vaccines do not work
By Daily Expose on September 12, 2021 • ( Leave a comment )
A graduate of Yale University who also obtained a PHD at Princeton University and an MD degree from the John Hopkins University School of Medicine has published a paper in which she concludes that mandating the public to take a vaccine is a harmful and damaging act because of excellent scientific research papers which clearly demonstrate the vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of Covid-19.
Nina Pierpoint (MD, PhD) published a paper on September 9th analysing various studies that were published in August 2021 which prove the alleged Delta Covid-19 variant is evading the current Covid-19 injections on offer and therefore do not prevent infection or transmission of Covid-19.
The Doctor of Medicine explained in her published paper that vaccines aim to achieve two ends –
1. Protect the vaccinated person against the illness
2. Keep vaccinated people from carrying the infection and transmitting it to others.
However, the Doctor of Medicine writes that herd immunity will not be reached through vaccination because new research in multiple settings shows that the alleged Delta variant produces very high viral loads which are just as high, and in some cases higher in the vaccinated population compared to the unvaccinated population.
Therefore, according to Nina Pierpoint (MD, PhD), vaccine mandates; such as the one now enforced in the UK for all Care Home staff, have no justification because vaccinating individuals does not stop or even slow the spread of the alleged dominant Delta Covid-19 variant.
Which leads the Doctor of Medicine to conclude that natural immunity is much more protective than vaccination because all severities of Covid-19 illness produce healthy levels of natural immunity.
Nine Pieroint (MD, PhD) cites three studies whose findings and data support her conclusions and these include a study published August 6th 2021 in the Centre for Disease Control’s (CDC) ‘Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report’, another study published August 10th 2021 by Oxford University, and a final study published August 24th 2021 which was funded by the UK Department for Health and Social Care.
CDC Study
The CDC study focused on 469 cases among Massachusetts residents who attended indoor and outdoor public gatherings over a two week period. The results found that 346 of the cases were among vaccinated residents with 79% of them presenting with alleged Covid-19 symptoms, and 1.2% being hospitalised.
However the remaining 123 cases were among the unvaccinated population with just 1 person being hospitalised (0.8%. No deaths occurred in either group. The study also found that viral loads were found to be very similar among the vaccinated and unvaccinated, meaning they were equally infectious.
Oxford University Study
The Oxford University study examined 900 hospital staff members in Vietnam who had been vaccinated with the Oxford / AstraZeneca viral vector injection between March and April 2021. The entire hospital staff tested negative for the Covid-19 virus in mid May 2021 however, the first case among the vaccinated staff members was discovered on June 11th.
All 900 hospital staff were then retested for the Covid-19 virus and 52 additional cases were identified immediately, forcing the hospital into lockdown. Over the next two weeks, 16 additional cases were identified.
The study found that 76% of the Covid-19 positive staff developed respiratory symptoms, with 3 staff members developing pneumonia and one staff member requiring three days of oxygen therapy. Peak viral loads among the fully vaccinated infected group were found to be 251 times higher than peak viral loads found among the staff in March – April 2020 when they were not vaccinated.
UK Department of Health & Social Care Study
The UK Department of Health & Social Care study is an analysis of ongoing population wide SARS-CoV-2 monitoring in the UK and includes measures of viral load among the population.
The study found that viral loads among the vaccinated and unvaccinated population are virtually the same, and much higher than had been recorded prior to the Covid-19 injection roll-out. The study also found that the majority of cases among the vaccinated population were presenting with symptoms when they became positive.
The authors of the study conclude that the Pfizer and Oxford / AstraZeneca injection have lost efficacy against what they claim to be the Delta Covid-19 variant, but they maintain that they are substantially effective at keeping people from becoming infected with the Delta variant in the rang of 67% to 80%.
Nine Pierpoint (MD, PhD) rightly asks in her paper how they can conclude this when 82% of the random sample of new positive PCR tests in the study were fully vaccinated people.
The Doctor of Medicine writes –
‘If a vaccine reduces the risk of becoming infected by two-thirds (67%), we would expect the proportion of vaccinated in the positive sample to be less than the proportion of vaccinated in the population.
Say we start with 1000 people in the country, of whom we will randomly sample 100. The country is 80% vaccinated. This means that in our sample of 100 we have 80 vaccinated and 20 unvaccinated people.
Let’s say that the virus has infected 10% of the people across the sampling period, or 10 total cases. If 8 of the infected are among the vaccinated, and 2 in the unvaccinated (80% and 20% of the positives, matching the ratio of vaccinated and unvaccinated in the population), the vaccine has made no difference in whether one can get infected (0% efficacy). If the vaccine is 67% effective, the cases in the vaccinated group would be reduced by 2/3 to 2.67 cases, and the total cases would be only 4.67 cases (2.67 vaccinated and 2 unvaccinated).
This means that only 2.67/4.67 or 57% of the cases would be in the vaccinated group, and 43% in the unvaccinated. (We can go back to 10% overall being positive just using ratios, yielding 5.7 cases among the vaccinated and 4.3 among the unvaccinated.)
This is why the proportion vaccinated in the infected sample, very close to the proportions vaccinated in the total population, are incompatible with the efficacy numbers generated by the authors.
It appears to me—as in the Massachusetts study—that the vaccine is not decreasing susceptibility to infection at all, and is in reality somewhere between slightly (insignificantly) decreasing susceptibility and slightly increasing susceptibility to the Delta variant.
The UK study is clear that viral load (and thus infectiousness to others) is much greater with Delta than with Alpha, and that, with Delta, viral load and infectiousness are equal in vaccinated and unvaccinated infected people.’
The above three studies lead Nina Pierpoint (MD, PhD) to conclude in her paper that mandating others to take a vaccine is a potentially harmful, damaging act.
She writes that since the principal reason of a mandate is to protect others from infection, and these studies prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they do not do this, those who mandate the Covid-19 injections may wish to seek legal councel regarding their culpability and liability for potential long-lasting harm to those whom they pressure into vaccination with the threat of exclusion from employment, education or society.
The Expose
I simply don’t understand why people get herded into taking vaccines which don’t work, according to my betters, however this is the Covid Crusher which would stop this Covid Pandemic dead, if everyone practiced it and it is free, from me:
The Achilles Heel of Coronavirus, is while it is still in the developing stage as Coronavirus/Covid in the warm, wet areas inside the nasal passages of your head (nose) and before it gets to become Covid in your head and lungs, 10 to 14 days later. If Coronavirus is not treated with my free iodine salt clean water cure to flush out your nasal passages, as soon as possible, or during self isolation, it becomes Covid, which is where the money is. You cannot catch Covid! Always breathe through your nose and keep your mouth shut, because you really don’t want the Coronavirus to seed itself in your lungs!! My free salt water cure has “absolutely nothing” to do with mRNA test vaccines. Treating Coronavirus with my free iodine salt clean water cure, flushes out the nasal cavity and kills Coronavirus, before it gets to be Covid, irrespective of if you have had mRNA vaccines or not. Mix one heaped teaspoon of iodine salt in a mug of warm or cold clean water, cup a hand and pour some of the solution in, then sniff or snort that mugful up into your nose, spitting out everything which comes down into your mouth, by so doing, you flush out your nasal cavity, where Coronavirus lives. If you get a burning sensation (which lasts for 2-3 minutes) then you have a Coronavirus infection.When the soreness goes away, blow out your head with toilet paper and flush away, washing your hands afterwards and continue doing my salt clean water nasal cavity flush cure, morning, noon and night, or more often, if you want, until, when you do my free salt water cure, you don’t experience any soreness at all in your nasal cavity. While you are at it, swallow a couple of mouthfulls and if you get a burning sensation in your chest, then you are killing the Covid/Bronchitis there too, so keep it up, each time you do a salt water sniffle, until the soreness in your head and lungs goes away – job done. Pour some of the solution on a flat surface and allow to dry and see what you have then. This is what coats the nasal passages in your head and kills Coronavirus/Covid off. You can see why it is so effective. This is what I have done for the past 27 years and I am NEVER ill, nor do you need to be either.
Please pass it around to everyone who wants to give it a try.
“Even so, a key issue is that the current vaccines block severe disease but do not prevent infection, said Dr. Gregory Poland, a vaccine scientist at the Mayo Clinic. That is because the virus is still capable of replicating in the nose, even among vaccinated people, who can then transmit the disease through tiny, aerosolized droplets”
Reuters – what my free salt water cure stops.
He added that “Current vaccines are great at preventing [CO1] serious infection deep in the lungs, but not at blocking infection in the upper airways. What’s needed is a nasal-spray (vaccine) that would stop the coronavirus from taking hold at all.” – what my free salt water cure does and stops.
No soreness when you do it, it feels like you are flushing your head with water, if you get sore reaction, you have a virus so deal with it, exactly as I have described above – did a sniffle today – Me, all OK!!
We all need a cure which works instead of these vaccines, when you get a Coronavirus infection – now you have one.
Do not use saline water bought online, use iodine based kitchen or sea salt, it is the iodine in the salt which kills Coronavirus dead
Keep safe. Richard
[…] Covid-19 vaccines have proven to be extremely unsafe so far with over 1.1 million adverse reactions and over 1,600 deaths being reported to the MHRA Yellow Card […]