Breaking News

Unvaccinated Americans Refuse Blood Transfusions From Vaccinated Donors Due to Spike Protein Fears

10 Surprising Facts On World Blood Donor Day 2017
It has been reported that as much as 70 percent of blood in the US being donated is coming from Covid vaccinated donors.

Many unvaccinated Americans are refusing blood transfusions from vaccinated donors for fear that the blood from someone who has received a Covid-19 vaccine is tainted in some way.

Of course, the mainstream media and some health news websites quickly jumped on the opportunity to label these so-called anti-vaxxers as spreaders of medical misinformation. They say that these “anti-vaxxers” believe that the blood of a vaccinated individual contains a microchip or ingredients necessary for human cloning.

According to official statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the majority of Americans are now believed to be vaccinated against Covid-19, with 60 percent of the US population and 72 percent of adults at least partially vaccinated. This means that available blood donors in the country at this point are mostly vaccinated.

Dr Julie Katz Karp, director of the blood transfusion program at Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals in Philadelphia, said: “We are definitely aware of patients who have refused blood products from vaccinated donors.

“If for some reason we didn’t want vaccinated people to donate blood, we’d be in a real problem, wouldn’t we? Please believe us when we tell you it’s fine.”

Blood centers in the US only have limited access to donated blood that has not in some way been affected by Covid-19. Katz estimated that, based on samples, as much as 70 percent of the blood currently being donated is coming from vaccinated donors.

Dr Michael Busch, director of the Vitalant Research Institute, said that more than 90 percent of current donors in the US have either been infected with Covid-19 or vaccinated against it. Busch has been monitoring antibody levels in blood samples from the US supply.

Currently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not recommend routine screening for Covid-19 among blood donors. In general, respiratory viruses are not known to spread by blood transfusions, and there has been no reported case of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the disease, being transmitted through blood.

Emily Osment, an American Red Cross spokeswoman, said that her organisation has received countless questions from clients worried that the vaccinated blood would be tainted and capable of transmitting components from the Covid-19 vaccines. In response, Red Cross officials have reassured clients that the vaccine does not circulate in the blood.

Jessa Merrill, the Red Cross director of biomedical communications, said in an email: “While the antibodies that are produced by the stimulated immune system in response to vaccination are found throughout the bloodstream, the actual vaccine components are not.”

In recent months, many censored doctors have spoken out about the concern that vaccinated individuals can shed protein molecules from a vaccinated person to an unvaccinated person, effectively infecting the unvaccinated person the same way a person can be infected with a virus.

Despite the mainstream media’s work to quickly shut down any suggestion that the Covid-19 vaccines can shed, a Pfizer document appears to confirm these fears. Hundreds, potentially thousands, of women have reported that they have suffered irregular bleeding after receiving a dose of the Covid-19 vaccines, with others sadly reporting that they have lost their unborn child or suffering from irregular bleeding after being in the company of fully vaccinated individuals.

Within a Pfizer document titled ‘A Phase 1/2/3, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Dose-Finding Study To Evaluate The Safety Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 RNA Vaccine Candidates Against Covid-19 in Healthy Individuals’, there is a section dedicated to the possibility of ‘mRNA vaccine shedding’ in which it is possible for those who have been in close proximity to someone who has been vaccinated to suffer an adverse reaction.

Pfizer confirms in this document that exposure during pregnancy can occur if a pregnant woman is “environmentally exposed” to the vaccine. This includes if a pregnant woman is exposed to the vaccine through inhalation or skin contact. Pfizer is basically admitting that it is possible to expose another human to the Covid-19 vaccine just by breathing the same air or touching the skin of someone who has been vaccinated.

If it is possible for vaccinated individuals to shed the vaccine just through touch and breath, then just think what the potential implications could be if unvaccinated individuals receive blood from those who are fully jabbed.

Whilst the CDC and other health agencies have assured that the Covid-19 vaccine remains within the injection site and does not travel around the body, a bio-distribution study on the Pfizer vaccine conducted in Japan exposed this lie.

The study used luciferase enzymes and radioisotope markers to track the distribution of Pfizer’s mRNA Lipid NanoParticles (LNPs) across the body. Researchers found that mRNA LNPs are distributed across the body, reaching the brain, spleen, heart and even the ovaries and testes.

LNPs were even discovered in the blood and plasma, with the ‘mean total lipid concentration (μg lipid equivalent / g (or mL)) (males and females combined)’ reaching 8.90 in plasma within 2 hours, and 5.40 in whole blood.

This clear evidence, which of course will not be reported by the mainstream media, raises questions as to what effects the vaccine will have on the whole body as it is documented to travel through almost every organ. Therefore, it is understandable why so many Americans are concerned about what the impact of receiving vaccinated blood will be, and we Brits too should share the same concerns.


The Exposé is now censored on
Google, Facebook & Twitter.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the

facts the mainstream refuse to…

We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies and propaganda on their

behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead we rely solely on your support, so
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism.
It’s quick and easy…

Please choose your preferred
method to show your support


Latest UK Health Security Agency report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have NEGATIVE effectiveness as low as MINUS 124%
Last week we told you how the Covid-19 vaccines were proving to …
Children are up to 16 times more likely to die with Covid-19 if they’ve had the Covid Vaccine according to latest UK Health Security Agency report
The latest report from the UK Health Security Agency shows that the …
The UK’s Vaccine Damage Payment Act and Thoughtless Hospital Staff
The UK’s Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 The UK’s Vaccine Damage Payments …
Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates Leading to Emergency Service Staff Shortage, Endangering Americans
The collapse caused by the elites and others exploiting the Covid-19 pandemic …
Southwest Airlines Steps Away From Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate After Employees Protest
Following the vaccine mandates against airline employees, many are fighting back against …
Under The Cover of Covid There’s a Deliberate Three-Pronged Attack on Our Health and Our Lives Using Test Swabs, Face Masks and Toxins
Kevin Galalae has published his research in a document titled: PCR Tests …
Harvard University study finds most vaccinated countries have highest number of Covid-19 cases per million people suggesting the jabs do not work
COVID-19 injections have been presented as the only solution to stop the …
Midazolam was the real killer in this pandemic, not Covid-19
Midazolam is a commonly used drug in palliative care, think of it …
Hospital whistleblower says she was not allowed to report adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines suffered by patients
Deborah Conrad, says there is concerning and dangerous underreporting to the Vaccine …
Share this page to Telegram
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Austrian Peter
Austrian Peter
1 month ago

This is a simple dilemma to resolve. If the blood of vaccinated individuals contains toxic spike proteins, which seems pretty obvious to me, then these will be transferred during a blood transfusion. A simple D-dimer test will confirm our worst fears, yet this is not promoted, as is the case with Ivermectin.
https://www.webmd.com/dvt/what-is-the-d-dimer-test

Public Health people will use every method to suppress this vital information. Saline solution is a good substitute for blood to build bulk and allow the natural body function to replenish the real thing.

Richard Hoard
Richard Hoard
Reply to  Austrian Peter
1 month ago

I am making a good salary from home $1200-$2500/week , which is amazing, under a year back I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone, Here is what I do…. http://www.works61.com

Last edited 1 month ago by Richard Hoard
Annie
Annie
Reply to  Richard Hoard
1 month ago

I’m making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is where i started… https://Www.Paycash1.com

Last edited 1 month ago by Annie
Lorraine
Lorraine
Reply to  Austrian Peter
1 month ago

I get paid over $87 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Here’s what I’ve been doing… http://Www.NetPay1.com

Last edited 1 month ago by Lorraine
RobertRogers
RobertRogers
Reply to  Austrian Peter
1 month ago

Everyone has the opportunity to find a job! You can work from the comfort of your home, using your computer. Additionally, you can work according to your schedule. You can work this job As part-time or As A full-time job. Online work can earn you up to $1000 per day. It’s easy, just follow the instructions on the home page, read it carefully from start to finish.
For more information, visit the following website.—-> http://Www.NetJob1.com

Last edited 1 month ago by RobertRogers
Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
1 month ago

Blood banks can now take blood from any blood type person and they have a mechanical way of cleaning the blood so that it can be used in any blood type, onwards, so that, I would assume, vaccinated blood would be as clean as unvaccinated blood.

However, if my life depended on blood from the blood bank, I would put my life on the blood I was provided with, irrespective of whom it came from or how it was donated.

wait
wait
Reply to  Richard Noakes
1 month ago

Wait, aren’t you the salt snorting bloke who’s never been ill in 20,000 years because you shove ‘salt’ up your nose twice a day? My apologies if you’re not…

> I would assume, vaccinated blood would be as clean as unvaccinated blood.

Very sciensy. Making random assumptions will get you infected (killed).

> However, if my life depended on blood from the blood bank, I would put my life on the blood I was provided with, irrespective of whom it came from or how it was donated.

What if it meant you’d become infected with hiv (as thousands of nhs ‘patients’ have)?

Personally, I’d like to know where it came from, but the ‘nhs’ would just lie to me anyway, saying whatever they think I want to hear to make me do whatever they want me to do.

infection
infection
1 month ago

> “Please believe us when we tell you it’s fine.”

Er, no.

And in any case, doesn’t this work both ways? Why aren’t the poisoned (vaxxed) afraid of pure blood from the unvaxxed (which might be ‘infected’)?

Freeeeedooooom
Freeeeedooooom
1 month ago

As an blood donor for almost 20 years I’ve now had enough with how the “dirty unjabbed” are treated. Here in Norway medical apartheid is in effect, and the unjabbed have to suffer humiliating lines at the airport to be pocked up the brain with the PCR-tests. If they refuse they risk charges and fines.

So based on this I’m going to notify the blood bank that I’m no longer interested in beeing a donor when the government acts this way. If my blood is good enough to donate, then it should be good enough for me not to be treated like a plaque victim.

chess
chess
Reply to  Freeeeedooooom
1 month ago

So, you’re at the airport and you refuse to have your snot removed and they fine you. Do they then let you on the plane anyway? I mean, why fine you? If you won’t donate some snot, then no plane journey, but you’d have not gone to the airport to begin with in this case, right? Alternatively, go to airport, refuse snot collection, pay fine, get on plane regardless. Those are the only two options as far as I can see.

Freeeeedooooom
Freeeeedooooom
Reply to  chess
1 month ago

They snot you when you return, not on the way out. The jabbed don’t need to.

chess
chess
Reply to  Freeeeedooooom
1 month ago

Oh I see, my mistake. I have only ever been in an airport once in my entire life, and that was a long time ago. I thought they’d be trying to protect the other passengers on the plane you were getting on, as well as the people in the country you were going to. But I guess not.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Natuurlijk hebben de mainstream media en sommige gezondheidswebsites snel van de gelegenheid gebruik gemaakt om deze zogenaamde anti-vaxxers te bestempelen als verspreiders van medische misinformatie. Zij zeggen dat deze “anti-vaxxers” geloven dat het bloed van een gevaccineerd individu een microchip bevat of ingrediënten die nodig zijn voor het klonen van mensen, aldus The Daily Expose. […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Veel ongevaccineerde Amerikanen weigeren bloedtransfusies van gevaccineerde donoren uit angst dat het bloed van iemand die een Covid-19 vaccin heeft gekregen, op de een of andere manier aangetast is, schrijft Dailyexpose.co.uk. […]

Annonymous
Annonymous
1 month ago

Dont take other peoples blood anyway Unless your a vampire No two peoples blood are really tbe same regardless if the type. And your body replaces blood itself naturally ,sunless your going to die of blood loss unless they stop letting you bleed or because theye let you lose si much that you will die any second ,then don’t let them put someone else’s in you.They dont know what deadly viruses it could contain just like they didnt know about hep c or aids until years after the diseases had been created. .

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read More: Unvaccinated Americans Refuse Blood Transfusions From Vaccinated Donors Due to Spike Prot… […]