Breaking News

NEW – Latest PHE report shows the Covid-19 vaccines are INCREASING the risk of hospitalisation and death due to Covid-19 significantly

The latest Public Health England technical briefing on Covid-19 variants of concern has been published and it reveals that up to the 2nd August 2021, 65% of all alleged Covid-19 deaths since February 2021 have been people who were vaccinated against the disease.

The report, which is the 20th update to be released, also shows that the risk of hospitalisation and death is astronomically higher if you have been fully vaccinated and catch the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

According to the PHE report, 300,010 cases of the delta Covid-19 variant have been confirmed since the 1st February 2021.

Of these roughly 50% were people who had not been vaccinated against Covid-19, with a total of 151,054 cases being recorded in the past 7 months.

Roughly 8% were people who’d had one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine less than 21 days prior to testing positive, with a total of 24,018 cases being recorded.

Roughly 15% were people who’d had one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine more than 21 days prior to testing positive, with a total of 46,089 cases being recorded.

And roughly 15% were people who were fully vaccinated prior to testing positive, with a total of 47,008 cases.

In all people who’d had at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine account for 39% of all confirmed cases of the Delta Covid-19 variant since February 1st 2021 up to 2nd August 2021.

However, the Covid-19 vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission. This was recently confirmed in a document published (see here) by the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE), in which they said research should now concentrate on producing a vaccine that prevents transmission and infection due to the current vaccines not preventing infection in most people.

You’ll have noticed above how SAGE stated they “feel that current vaccines are excellent for reducing the risk of hospital admission”. Unfortunately for them, “feeling” something isn’t enough, as the Public Health England data does not support that “feeling”.

The report shows that since the 1st February 2021 out of the 151,054 people infected with Covid-19 who had not been vaccinated, a total of 2,960 of the group ended up being admitted to hospital. This translates to 1.95% of all confirmed cases in the unvaccinated group up to the 2nd August 2021.

Since the 1st February 2021 out of the 24,018 people infected with Covid-19 who’d had one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine less than 21 days prior to their confirmed infection, a total of 234 of the group ended up being admitted to hospital. This translates to 0.97% of all infections in this group up to the 2nd August 2021.

Since the 1st February 2021 out of the 46,089 people infected with Covid-19 who’d had one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine more than 21 days prior to their confirmed infection, a total of 528 people ended up being admitted to hospital.. This translates to 1.14% of all infection in this group up to the 2nd August 2021.

Finally, since the 1st February 2021 out of the 47,008 people infected with Covid-19 who were fully vaccinated, a total of 1,355 of the group ended up being admitted to hospital. This translates to 2.882% of all cases in the fully vaccinated group.

This means a much higher percentage of people are being hospitalised after being infected with Covid-19 once they are fully vaccinated, compared to if they have not had a single dose of the Covid-19 vaccine at all.

The Covid-19 vaccines are meant to reduce the risk of hospitalisation by up to 95%. The Public Health England data is showing us that the Covid-19 vaccines actually increase the risk of hospitalisation by 48%.

But perhaps SAGE’s “feelings” are justified in terms of the Covid-19 vaccine reducing the risk of death?

Well the Public Health England report shows us that since the 1st February 2021, out of the 151,054 cases and 2,960 hospitalisations of the unvaccinated group, a total of 253 people have sadly died. This translates to 0.167% of cases and 8.54% of hospitalisations within the unvaccinated group up to the 2nd August 2021.

Since the 1st February 2021 out of the 24,018 people infected with Covid-19 who’d had one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine less than 21 days prior to their confirmed infection, a total of 10 people have sadly died. This translates to 0.04% of all cases and 4.2% of all hospitalisations within this group up to the 2nd August 2021.

Since the 1st February 2021 out of the 46,089 people infected with Covid-19 who’d had one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine more than 21 days prior to their confirmed infection, a total of 69 people have sadly died. This translates to 0.15% of all cases and 13% of all hospitalisations within this group up to the 2nd August 2021.

Finally, since the 1st February 2021 out of the 47,008 people infected with Covid-19 who were fully vaccinated, a total of 402 people sadly died. This translates to 0.85% of all cases and 29.6% of all hospitalisations within the fully vaccinated group.

This means a much higher percentage of people are dying after being infected with Covid-19 and after being hospitalised with Covid-19 once they are fully vaccinated, compared to if they have not had a single dose of a Covid-19 vaccine at all.

The Public Health England data shows that rather than the Covid-19 vaccines reducing the risk of death due to Covid-19 by 95% when exposed to the Covid-19 virus, they in fact increase the risk of death by 431.25% when exposed to the Covid-19 virus.

It also shows that the risk of death once hospitalised with Covid-19 if fully vaccinated increases by 262.5%.

The Covid-19 vaccines do not prevent infection and they do not prevent transmission, this is a fact. Even SAGE have officially stated this in their recent published paper. They are supposed to reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death when exposed to the Covid-19 virus, but the Public Health England data clearly shows the vaccines are having the opposite effect and are actually increasing the risk of hospitalisation and death significantly.

Yet for some reason authorities in the United Kingdom have decided to implement a vaccine passport system from the Autumn, enshrine a no jab, no job policy in law for carers – despite the jabs not preventing transmission, and have outrageously decided to start giving the Covid-19 vaccines to children, despite their risk of hospitalisation and death being so small that the number is negligible.

The evidence shows that the Covid-19 vaccines are either not working, or they are making recipients worse – possibly due to antibody-dependent enhancement which the world was warned about.

We are in the middle of Summer so at the moment the number of deaths are low, yet 65% of deaths since the 1st February are people who had been vaccinated. Therefore, the evidence suggests this winter is going to be an incredibly difficult one for an extraordinary amount of people.



The Exposé is now censored on
Google, Facebook & Twitter.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the

facts the mainstream refuse to…

We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies and propaganda on their

behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead we rely solely on your support, so
please support us in our efforts to bring
you honest, reliable, investigative journalism.
It’s quick and easy…

Please choose your preferred
method to show your support


A Patent Issued for The Purpose of Contact Tracing All Vaccinated Humans Worldwide – “Wake up stupid little sheep. You are being led to your slaughter.”
“What I’m suggesting is the inoculation is a guise to literally put …
#CovidVaxExposed PART 4 Update II: Pfizer Scientist Reveals Some More – antibodies transfer via the umbilical cord and the “vaccine just doesn’t work” in some people
Ten days ago James O’Keefe caught up with Pfizer scientist Nick Karl …
Latest UKHSA report shows Vaccinated accounted for 80% of Covid-19 Deaths and 60% of Hospitalisations in the last 4 weeks
The latest figures published by the new UK Health Security Agency on …
An analysis of Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness shows they simply don’t work
There have been plenty of illustrations now about the deception of 90% …
Lockdown babies are suffering significant verbal, motor and cognitive difficulties according to scientific studies
The COVID-19 pandemic, or more precisely, the enforced measures that were put …
Australia building Permanent Covid-19 Quarantine Camps for “Ongoing Operations”
Pictured: The planned Wellcamp quarantine facility Despite the Covid-19 "pandemic" being pretty …
#CovidVaxExposed PART 5 Update III: Pfizer Senior Director of Worldwide Research, Vanessa Gelman, “Sprints Away” from Veritas Journalist
A week ago Melissa Strickler exposed Pfizer’s secrets.  Since then, Strickler has …
NHS Nurses served Notice of Liability for any harm caused to children by the Covid-19 vaccine they were there to administer at UK School
Concerned parents have served a notice of liability to two NHS nurses …
VAERS Report: Healthy 16-Year-Old Boy Dies During Online Class Following Second Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine
According to an entry on the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), …
Share this page to Telegram
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
53 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gordon Bird
Gordon Bird
2 months ago

There is NO SUCH THING as a Sars-CoV-2 virus! The Spike Protein is the Killer in the So-Called” Vaccine! It causes Blood clots in many.Dr. Charles Hoffe says that 62% of his patients who have had the “VACCINE” ” have Blood clots in their capileries! These need a D-DIMA test to check!

Rai
Rai
Reply to  Gordon Bird
2 months ago

PRECISELY! I wish people who really should know better would stop referring to the (never isolated, never proven to exist) illusory virus as “the disease.” And it’s incredible how so many of all these “alt” publications still refer to the experimental nano-tech gene altering lethal injection as a “vaccine.” Even Robert Kennedy’s CHD persists in doing the latter, which beggars belief. Is it just severe cognitive dissonance or is something else going on?

https://www.filmforfreedom.co.uk

Last edited 2 months ago by Rai
not
not
Reply to  Rai
2 months ago

I wish people would stop spouting pointless irrelevant things. There are far more important issues, like being forced to take a deadly vaccine, being held prisoner in britain if you refuse, total loss of ‘freedom’ to 24hr government spying, being forced to pay for rich people’s kids, being forced to pay someone to live in ‘their’ home, and so on. Who cares how you classify something? Unless you still believe you can beat the rich by using the system they set up explicitly to beat you?

Dale
Dale
Reply to  not
2 months ago

I don’t regard proof of isolation a small thing. As long as belief in viruses persist, we will continue to hold others responsible, for our health, and there will always be a “next one” and perhaps even a “bigger one.”

Grofus
Grofus
Reply to  Dale
2 months ago

OK, the virus has been isolated. Several labs have done so.
It turns out to be a good thing though because imperical evidence has shown the virus to be man made. Deliberately modified to infect humans.
Go over to uk column and look at the Dr’s for Covid ethics symposium.
Its all in there. We have been HAD.

Mat
Mat
Reply to  Grofus
2 months ago

yes the virus has been isolated…

https://www.sciencesetavenir.fr/sante/le-coronavirus-covid-19-en-images_141916

no , imperical evidence has not proved it to be man made.

anaphylaxis
anaphylaxis
Reply to  Mat
2 months ago

Plenty of published claims of isolation and EM images of exosomes (not direct proof of a virus). The term ‘isolation’ in virology does not mean what you think it does in English. The virus has not been isolated, hence the court cases being thrown out in the UK, in Alberta Canada, and the recent FOIA request leading to the Irish GOV to assert they have no information on the existence of the virus.

Fritz
Fritz
Reply to  Mat
1 month ago

Empirical, not imperial. Which makes me think you are regurgitating.

Gundel
Gundel
Reply to  Grofus
1 month ago

It hasn’t. You don’t have to be a doc, to read a so called isolation process can prove it to you. Read the CDC’s for example. They are playing with words, misusing them. Isolation means to separate a thing from everything else. That part never happened with any virus ever. They take a sample, eg. lung fluid, they add other genetic materials to it (soil) and antibiotics (poison) and when cells die and release exosomes, they claim that they found the virus because cell died. (This is the process in nutshell.)
Dr Lanka made an experiment, they did the process without a sample taken from a ‘host’ infected, he simply used the other genetic materials to breed (the soil) and the antibiotics (poison) and got the very same result. Viruses aka. exosomes.

Last edited 1 month ago by Gundel
Gundel
Gundel
Reply to  Gordon Bird
1 month ago

And / or the graphene oxide in the vaccines.
Karen Kingston ex Pfizer employee testimony on it, it has graphene oxide but it is not on the ingredients list as couldn’t be use because it is a poison to human’ body.

Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
2 months ago

As I have said before, there are 2 steps to Covid. The first one is Coronavirus which everyone will get, irrespective of if they are vaccinated or not and to beat Coronavirus at that stage, irrespective of if you are vaccinated or not, do my free cure which you will find on my Twitter Blog RichardNoakes19.

The second step is Covid and the vaccines which are supposed to stop Covid from occurring some 20 days after infection and nothing else, so if you don’t choose to do my free simple cure, you are betting your life on the vaccines stopping Covid, which apparently, they don’t seem to be able to do – with a few exceptions.

Which begs the question, if the mRNA vaccines don’t do what they are supposed to do, that is stop Covid, what other possible use could they have except to promote death by being unable to breathe?

Why mRNA vaccines, well that is now in the hands of Pfizer who none of us elected to replace the Governments, but who have anyway:

Pfizer vaccine contracts with governments strangle people’s rights with no recourse for obvious malfeasance
Aug 4
Cybersecurity Expert Ehden Biber has legally obtained copies of the Pfizer contracts with Albania, Brazil, Israel and the EU.
He discovered the first one on an Albanian website, where it was published on January 2021. Its veracity was confirmed when he was able to see Brazil’s Pfizer contract, which is virtually identical on that country’s health ministry website, with a signature that was verified by DocuSign. He has since seen virtually same contract with the EU and heard the details of Israel’s Pfizer contract.
The contract, which exposes Pfizer to zero liability for anything and places the liability for everything on the government, which is called the “Purchaser” in the contract.
The deal is a criminal shakedown of epic proportions, the likes of which it is hard to even fathom. Why would anybody sign it?
Reading the contract’s language sheds some light on the inexplicable behavior of the government authorities of the world and on the true nature of this whole COVID operation.
It also may shed light on the untimely deaths of two African presidents and the Haitian president, who all very understandably refused to sign this contract!
In his blog, Biber wrote, “If you were wondering why #Ivermectin was suppressed, well, it is because the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does not allow them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will be found to treat COVID19, the contract cannot be voided.”
And here’s a shocking clause about supplying the product:
“Pfizer shall have no liability for any failure to deliver doses in accordance with any estimated delivery dates… nor shall any such failure give Purchaser any right to cancel orders for any quantities of Product.
“Pfizer shall decide on necessary adjustments to the number of Contracted Doses and Delivery Schedule due to the Purchaser … based on principles to be determined by Pfizer … Purchaser shall be deemed to agree to any revision.”
So Pfizer can breach its own contract but their hitmen will kill you if you refuse to sign it!
You can really see how this Globalist entity that is Pfizer hates nation states and will not recognize their laws but it acts like a “government that dictates to other governments around the world,” as Biber says. If we look around at the complete lawlessness and the meltdown of once-solid institutions all over the world, you can see that Big Pharma is being used like a massive battering ram against the national laws and national sovereignty of all nations.
The contract forces the “Purchaser”, which is how they refer to the nation that is contracting with them to defend Pfizer’s interests and not those of the citizens they’re supposed to be representing and defending – and whose taxpayer money they’re using to pay Pfizer these billions of dollars.
As Biber tweeted, Israel has turned into a pharmaceutical #BananaRepublic, where the priorities of a multinational supercedes the priorities of its citizens.
Not only is Pfizer held completely harmless from all claims, the “Purchaser”, ie, the national government is responsible for Pfizer’s legal defense against any and all claims!
However, “Pfizer shall have the right to assume control of such defense… and Purchaser shall pay all Losses, including, without limitation, the reasonable attorneys’ fees and other expenses incurred.” Pfizer makes sure the country will pay for everything.
I really don’t get why governments across the world have signed this. What’s in it for them? Did they sign this voluntarily? It really seems like a colossal shakedown and a complete abdication on the part of these governments to protect their people. It’s malfeasance on a scale that beggars belief.
THE ONLY WAY to get a product recall on these shots is if you can prove fault in Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP), which is regulated by the FDA.
However, CGMP will tell you NOTHING about mRNA, because we don’t have CGMP for an mRNA vaccine, so you cannot prove CGMP malpractice.
CairnsNews

Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
2 months ago

We can’t pursue Pfizer, but we can pursue the governments and the ministers who we elected to the task of looking after us and we might be able to quash the agreements with Pfizer, if a new government was elected whose take on things was very different from this governments signing away our rights to Pfizer – better a legal process against Pfizer, than continuing this vaccine rollout, over which we, the public have no rights or control of those vaccines and what they potentially do to us.

I am not disposed to violence, but it seems fundamentally wrong to me that Big Pharma can impose such terrible conditions on each of us, with impunity and for their financial betterment, so, perhaps those who are best advantaged from this, could be held responsible in different ways, by sending back to them, what they have delivered on us, so neither they or we, are winners at days end – if you get my drift.

We were once a nation of heroes, we had an Empire which stretched to all ends of the Earth and look at what we have become now, a plaything for the God Pfizer, to do with us as they please – thanks to our ministers who made this possible which begs the question, who employs the ministers now – Pfizer and other mRNA vaccine makers?.

not
not
Reply to  Richard Noakes
2 months ago

You can’t do anything. They control it all. Wake up and smell the dung heap. Use the courts? Use the law? Really? They own you. They control you. You can’t touch them. You’re like roman slaves in the colloseum telling each other they can get caesar if they do something or other. Except those slaves could have done something if their chains had been removed. You won’t do anything whatever happens. Just prattle on about laws and justiice and democracy. Crap.

Nicky
Nicky
Reply to  not
2 months ago

Such rank defeatism. If, as you say, there is nothing that we can do then please take the jab. Society will be a much better place in 12 to 24 months of you doing so.

Gundel
Gundel
Reply to  Nicky
1 month ago

Why? He/she is sadly right. There is a case running for a year or more on crowdjustice, The Coronavirus Act is Null and Void – read it back if you think. There never was a proper trial of it. Because the system is clearly corrupt. So who will arrest them? Who will really take them to court? They own everyone on important places it looks.
The Fuellmich challenge was a great hope. But with every day more and more die (vaccines, lack of health care, lack of work, etc) and still nothing happened with that trial either. Nothing which would change a thing.
He didn’t say to give up but be creative. In Italy vaccinated burned their vax passports as solidarity to the rest and to screw the vaccine passport plan. As far as I know citizens of Moscow did the same. (Just an example.)

kiwi
kiwi
2 months ago

canadian court rules covid virus does not exist, they have no isolated
samples, therefore it is a fraud

Rai
Rai
Reply to  kiwi
2 months ago

That’s right: the bleedin’ obvious that some of us have been pointing out ad nauseam (and getting no end of abuse for) since February 2020. Great that a judge has acknowledged the fact there’s not a single scientific paper in existence showing that “the virus” was ever isolated (a barmy and deeply anti-scientific process in itself) but of course it will be buried by all the pharma-poodles calling themselves journalists and everything will carry on as though nothing has happened…and by the way, nothing has happened numerous times already…but nobody noticed.

filmforfreedom.co.uk

not
not
Reply to  Rai
2 months ago

Oh, please click this link so I can get some google ad income…

Rai
Rai
Reply to  not
2 months ago

I’m making a film. I’m not making any money. It’s entirely self-funded and if you bothered to check the link before making unfounded allegations, you could find out what actually motivates me. Probably the same things that brings most of us to read articles like the above. And if you have the patience to read (which most people don’t) then read what’s written there and then make your judgements based on actual substance, rather than pure conjecture.

And for your information, I avoid google like the plague, along with every big tech social media platform. Why do I do that? Not a very good move if all I cared about was dosh, is it?

Last edited 2 months ago by Rai
Nicky
Nicky
Reply to  not
2 months ago

Troll alert!

SigfredOfNorse
SigfredOfNorse
2 months ago
www.desireestokkel.nl
www.desireestokkel.nl
2 months ago

Do you want to be on this card with your logo?

http://www.arrestteamrnl5821.agency

Banner.ArrestatieTeamRNL5821.D66.Politie.Defensie.Government.ICC.Stokkel..png
Anonymous
Anonymous
2 months ago

It will be because they will make it one. Because they want too and they can since they control the mainstream media and the politicians ,excluding a token few .

Ian Usher
Ian Usher
2 months ago

Great analysis as usual.
I expanded on this a little in this video, which looks at percentages of hospitalization and death compared to national vaccination percentages.
Very interesting result…
https://rumble.com/vktufc-vaccine-failure.html

Ian Usher
Ian Usher
2 months ago

I also spotted this in the Technical Analysis document #20 on page 35, under section 1.7:

This means that whilst vaccination may reduce an individual’s overall risk of becoming infected, once they are infected there is limited difference in viral load (and Ct values) between those who are vaccinated and unvaccinated. Given they have similar Ct values, this suggests limited difference in infectiousness. 

If that is the case, then what on Earth is the point of vaccine passports!?

no-difference.jpg
hen
hen
Reply to  Ian Usher
2 months ago

“then what on Earth is the point of vaccine passports”

first the “passport”, then start adding things to it, and keep adding until the have the same system as in china. that’s the point. and they’ll do it too, because there ain’t a single person in britain that’ll life a finger to stop them.

Nicky
Nicky
Reply to  hen
2 months ago

The only reason for introducing the vaccine passports is to coerce the unquestioning among us into having the vaccine as a way of getting their lives back.
Governments around the world are determined to have at least 80% of their population vaccinated. Which begs the question of why, when the vaccine offers very little benefit over a pathogen that has a 99.92% survival rate.

trackback
2 months ago

[…] Daily Expose also published a piece yesterday looking at the new PHE data and argued that it showed vaccination was actually increasing […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] Expose also published a piece looking at the new PHE data and argued that it showed vaccination was actually increasing the […]

trackback
2 months ago

[…] Expose also published a piece looking at the new PHE data and argued that it showed vaccination was actually increasing the risk […]

Marco
Marco
2 months ago

Unfortunately, the hospital admission and death figures in Public Health England technical bulletins are close to useless to establish any facts or even hypotheses about any differences in outcomes between vaccination and non-vaccination. There are multiple reasons. One key factor is what is called “sampling bias”. The number of cases reported in PHE bulletins is derived from a non-random sample of the country population. This sample is the group of people who are tested for Covid-19 (millions in a day). This group is not representative of the English population.

As a result, vaccinated/unvaccinated is only one of the many characteristics of this group that could, individually or in combination, explain differences in outcomes [by outcome I mean an endpoint of interest, for example, risk of admission to hospital, or risk of deaths]. For example, being employed or being a student, which tend to include people below a certain age, might make it more likely to be tested through one’s work place or school/college/university, and hence younger people could be over-represented in the “cases” count: simply because they are tested more often, employed people and people in education, and younger people would appear to have a higher chance to test positive. But it is the testing process that makes them look more likely to test positive, not their employment or age. If you consider that younger people have been vaccinated less often than older people, you can see that any inference about the effect of the vaccinated/unvaccinated status on outcomes could in fact be due to the sampling bias.

Another key factor that makes these PHE statistics of little use, is the usual notion of “tested positive within 28 days of the event”. Here we have no idea of the actual cause of admission to hospital, or the actual cause of death. Also, we have no idea of what comorbidities those who died had in the first place. As a result, the difference in deaths between vaccinated and unvaccinated people might have little bearing with vaccination itself.

It seems that PHE is trying to add depth to their bulletins. They have started to stratify their figures by age <50 and age >=50. Stratification means grouping figures by a certain characteristic of the population, which in this case is being below 50, or being 50 or above. The setting of 50 as demarcation point seems to me totally arbitrary. More meaningful would be to have stratification by narrower age intervals, say, 0-9, 10-19, 20-29, and so on. But even that would not be enough to infer anything, as the problems about the definition of a positive case and sampling bias still remain.

To see what tenuous conclusions one can arrive at with PHE bulletin figures, consider the risk of deaths between vaccinated and unvaccinated people in the two separate age groups. If you do the math, the <50 are 60% more likely to die if they are vaccinated [however this is not statistically significant, mainly because the number of deaths in this age group is very small]. Those aged >=50 are instead 70% less likely to die if they are vaccinated. Is the age of 50 really so significant, that being below it it is better not to be vaccinated, and above it is better instead to be? While there could be some truth in this, it would be too quick to conclude anything meaningful. Perhaps, it simply is the case that there is an higher majority of younger people who have pre-existing conditions and so decided to get vaccinated, and these were also the ones more likely to die compared to those younger people who did not get vaccinated and among which there are less people with pre-existing conditions. Conversely, for the older age group, it could be that those who were most frail and near the end of their life were not vaccinated as it would have been deemed inappropriate. They would be more likely to die than the fitter and vaccinated in the same age group, hence giving the impression that being unvaccinated was the cause of higher risk of death in this age group. It was instead their pre-existing status of being nearing the end of life that increased their risk of dying.

Another very important factor that makes these bulletins’ figures close to useless is that they are cumulative, that is, they put together all cases and events since February 2021. Since then vaccination rates among the different age groups have changed constantly. We do not know when those events, such as admission to hospital or death, occurred, and we cannot compare their rates with the incidence of vaccination in each age group at the time they occurred.

These bulletins’ data tables reflect the simplistic binary approach that governments have taken since the declaration of a pandemic back at the beginning of 2020. Vaccinated vs unvaccinated, under 50 vs above 50, symptomatic vs asymptomatic, positive case vs negative case. Unfortunately, to the exclusion of life and death, and male and female (let’s not start on the issue of non-binary: as UK passport applications prove, there exist only two options: male or female), nature is rarely so binary. Health vs disease is a myth: living unfolds in the continuum between the two.

Jill
Jill
2 months ago

Vaccinated Piers Morgan Asks Twitter for Advice Amid ‘Shocking’ COVID Symptoms 18 Days
Karma?

Last edited 2 months ago by Jill
Gundel
Gundel
Reply to  Jill
1 month ago

Rather propaganda. “This is normal, don’t worry, happened with me, too, just take the booster for the new variantS”.

Jill
Jill
2 months ago

Israel’s Director of Public Health Stuns TV Viewers with Statement that 50 Percent of New COVID Cases Are Among Fully Vaccinated

I’m not shocked. I saw this 6 months ago in the army. Before Delta! Nothing got reported.

Mat
Mat
2 months ago

The conclusions are false , there is no increased risk of hospitalisation for those vaccinated , one must consider the number of people vaccinated , in england over 47 million peopele have been vaccinated of a population of around 55 million.

so around 10 million are not vaccinated .

you have to compare equal numbers of vaccinated to those not vaccinated .

you have to multiply by 5 the number of hospitalisations of those not vaccinated in order to compare with the same number of vaccinted hospitalisations,

doing this shows that there is a much greater risk of hospitalisation if you are not vaccinated .

Gundel
Gundel
Reply to  Mat
1 month ago

In theory yes. But in reality you don’t know the real number of vaccinated. Besides there is an interesting thing, it looks as if some batches would cause more harm (side effects) than others. Also not everyone is magnetic after the vax but some (around 2/3) is. Which could mean that a part of the vaccines are placebos. (For control group of to avoid to many deaths and serious injuries too quickly.)

Roger Slemmer
Roger Slemmer
2 months ago

From my understanding of the spike protein which is the primary component of the vaccine, it is the part of virus that enables the virus to gain entry into the cells. It’s the key to the locks. The mRNA tells your body to make the spike protein, the key.

So it kind of makes sense that the virus gains entry more easily in the vaccinated. All the doors are already open when it arrives. The burglar has found an easy mark!

And guess what! The spike also weakens the defenses of the cells to other pathogens!

The mass vaccinations make the neighborhood into a high crime district and the burglars and armed robbers will have a killing spree where the general public has been disarmed!

A vulnerability has been created in our operating system and those poised to make a profit from it should be exposed, hanged, drawn and quartered!

Gundel
Gundel
Reply to  Roger Slemmer
1 month ago

Can we see any sound proof for this spike protein thing? As everyone (almost) is talking about it but the ‘science’ stops at talking or showing CGI videos but not real examinatons.
The blood examination of the vaccinated showed a very different material, something metallic looking, something shiny, a match to the qualities of graphene oxide.
The examination of more vaccines showed the same, the presence of graphene oxide.
An ex Pfizer employee – Karen Kingston – said the same, they used graphen oxide in the vax to deliver the modified stuff, she had an interview in the Stew Peters Show, even told how it worked, how the ingredients of the vax worked.
We don’t have a fully isolated virus but a fragment of something but we have a spike protein? Just call it poison, much easier. Only graphene oxide or another as plus?

trackback
1 month ago

[…] individuals are allegedly testing positive for Covid-19, being hospitalised and dying. The latest Public Health England report shows that fully vaccinated individuals account for 65% of all alleged Covid-19 deaths since […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] vacunadas supuestamente dan positivo en la prueba de Covid-19, están hospitalizadas y mueren. El último informe de Public Health England muestra que las personas completamente vacunadas representan el 65% de todas las supuestas muertes […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] individuals are allegedly testing positive for Covid-19, being hospitalised and dying. The latest Public Health England report shows that fully vaccinated individuals account for 65% of all alleged Covid-19 deaths since […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] individuals are allegedly testing positive for Covid-19, being hospitalised and dying. The latest Public Health England report shows that fully vaccinated individuals account for 65% of all alleged Covid-19 deaths since […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] supuestamente dan positivo en la prueba de Covid-19, están hospitalizadas y mueren. El último informe de Public Health England muestra que las personas completamente vacunadas representan el 65% de todas las supuestas […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] personer angivelig tester positivt for Covid-19, blir innlagt på sykehus og dør. Den siste Public Health England-rapporten viser at fullt vaksinerte individer står for 65% av alle påståtte dødsfall av Covid-19 […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] vaccinées ont été testées positives au Covid-19, puis hospitalisées et mourraient. Le dernier rapport de Public Health England montre que les personnes entièrement vaccinées représentent 65 % de […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] individuals are allegedly testing positive for Covid-19, being hospitalised and dying. The latest Public Health England report shows that fully vaccinated individuals account for 65% of all alleged Covid-19 deaths since […]

Asking Questions
Asking Questions
1 month ago

I checked this logic a couple months ago – don’t recall which health data report (maybe Scotland?) and found that for each age bracket individually (<50 and >=50), the percentage of deaths was lower amongst those vaccinated than those unvaccinated. However when you check the totals – as you’ve done here for England – the percentage death was higher amongst vaccinated. What I learned is that this is called Simpson’s Paradox – when all the sub-sets show one trend, but the total shows the reverse trend – and it is partly caused by the fact that one subset is contributing a very large proportion of the total. The cause is called a “confounding factor” – it means there is another factor influencing the mortality, and not just the vaccines – in this case, it is age. Those over 50 are far more likely to die of covid than those under.

BUT***** … when I re-did the same maths just now using the England data you have here, I found that one of the sub-sets of data has flipped its trend.

Now the age bracket <50 shows that vaccinated people are MORE likely to die of covid.than unvaccinated.

This breaks Simpson’s Paradox because the other sub-set (over 50) still shows the vaccinated far less likely to die than the unvaccinated.

I find this of immense concern. I really, really beg a mathematician to reproduce these results and see if they can explain them in a way that continues to justify that vaccines reduce death.

trackback
1 month ago

[…] estão supostamente com teste positivo para Covid-19, sendo hospitalizados e morrendo. O último relatório do Public Health England mostra que indivíduos totalmente vacinados respondem por 65% de todas as mortes alegadas por […]

trackback
1 month ago

[…] Read full article here Source: Daily Expose […]