Breaking News

Pfizer document confirms concerns of ‘Vaccine Shedding’ after thousands of women report irregular bleeding and miscarriage

Hundreds if not thousands of women have reported that they have suffered irregular bleeding/clotting after receiving one of the mRNA Covid vaccines. Sadly hundreds of others have reported the loss of their unborn child. However we are now also seeing hundreds of testimonies made by women who are saying that they have lost their unborn child or suffered irregular bleeding/clotting after being in the company of others who have received one of the mRNA Covid vaccines.

Sounds unbelievable doesn’t it? Well unfortunately a Pfizer document confirms that these farfetched reports are perfectly possible.

Dr Naomi Wolf, an American author and journalist has been extremely vocal on Twitter about the subject and back on April 19th 2021 she posted a link to a Facebook page, which can be found here. The page contains hundreds of accounts from women reporting irregular bleeding after either having the Covid vaccine or being in the company of those who’ve had the Covid vaccine.

ABC7 news reporter, Kate Larsen also questioned how the Covid jabs are affecting women’s menstrual cycles on social media which received thousands of responses from concerned women –

“I had my 1st COVID-19 vaccine in January followed by the 2nd in February, and since then I have had hemorrhagic bleeding with clots. This month of April was the heaviest.”

“I thought I was going crazy, and even went as far as making a doctor’s appt and switching out my BC because mine is so heavy now and its been a month straight”

“I received the Moderna vaccine in January and February I didn’t get my period for 3 months they did multiple blood test, pregnancy test and ultrasounds but everything came back normal. Then finally on April 4 I got my period and it’s been super heavy for the past 22 days non-stop.”


Buy us a coffee!

We also know from the UK Governments weekly reports on adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme that women are losing their baby after having one of the Covid jabs. The 13th report which included data inputted up to the 21st April 2021 marked a sad milestone, as the number of women reporting the loss of their baby after having one of the Covid vaccines passed the 100 mark.

With reports like this being made it is extremely interesting and concerning to find that hidden within a Pfizer document titled ‘A PHASE 1/2/3, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLIND, DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, IMMUNOGENICITY, AND EFFICACY OF SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATES AGAINST COVID-19 IN HEALTHY INDIVIDUALS’ is a whole section covering the possibility of ‘mRNA vaccine shedding’ in which it is possible for those who have been in close proximity of someone who has had the Pfizer mRNA jab to suffer an adverse reaction.

In section 8.3.5 of the document it describes how exposure during pregnancy or breastfeeding to the Pfizer mRNA jab during the trials should be reported to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness. This is strange because pregnant women / new mothers were and are not part of the safety trials. So how can they be exposed?

Well Pfizer confirms that exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female is found to be pregnant and is environmentally exposed to the vaccine during pregnancy. The document states that environmental exposure during pregnancy can occur if a female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having being exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. Or if a male family member of healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

In layman’s terms Pfizer are admitting in this document that it is possible to expose another human being to the mRNA Covid vaccine just by breathing the same air or touching the skin of the person who has been vaccinated.

Pfizer also confirm that it is possible to expose a baby to the mRNA vaccine via breastfeeding even if the mother has not received the Pfizer jab. They state this is again possible via environmental exposure, in which the mother is found to be breastfeeding an infant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.

Pfizer also confirm in section 8.3.5.3 of the document that adverse reactions may occur after ‘Occupational Exposure’. The document states occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention and says this “may or may not lead to the occurrence of an Adverse Event”.

The authorities and Fact Checkers are of course doing their best to try and sweep the thousands of testimonies from women under the carpet with several fact checking articles now out in the mainstream trying to belittle those who discuss the issue as “anti-vaxxers”. This includes Full Fact who are almost completely fully funded by Facebook.

The one thing all these fact checking sites fail to cover in their reports is that Pfizer have stated in black and white in their document that mRNA vaccine shedding is a real possibility, and they have extreme concerns about it when it comes to women and pregnancy.


The Exposé is now censored on
Google, Facebook & Twitter.

So we need your help to ensure
we can continue to bring you the

facts the mainstream refuse to…

We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies and propaganda on their

behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead we rely solely on your support, so
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism.
It’s quick and easy…

Please choose your preferred
method to show your support


No Pandemic Australia! – If You Believe There Was Then You Should Ask If Its Deadly Effect Doubled After the Covid “Vaccine” Roll-Out
Mortality statistics from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (“ABS”) show there never …
Pfizer’s Dr Scott Gottlieb; ex-FDA Chief & “Predictor” of Pandemics, pushed restrictive Covid policies in violation of Federal Ethics Rules
Dr. Scott Gottlieb practised internal medicine, and is a venture capitalist with …
Maine Hospital Fired so Many Unvaccinated Employees They Had to Close the ICU
A hospital in Maine fired so many of its employees for being …
Extracts from “Pandemic Diary of a Frontline Lawyer for the Elderly” – Part 1
We have kindly been provided with the journal of Clare Wills Harrison, …
In Australia, “Fully Vaccinated” To Become “Unvaccinated” if They Fail to Take All Required Covid-19 Vaccine “Booster” Shots
Premier Daniel Andrews, a politician from the Australian state of Victoria has …
Return of the Face Mask: The Cloth of Compliance is risking the health of our Children
An article in the Bristol Post 19th October 2021, has reported that …
Latest UKHSA report shows Vaccinated accounted for 82% of Covid-19 Deaths & 65% of Hospitalisations in England over the past 4 weeks
The latest figures published by the new UK Health Security Agency on …
Latest UK Health Security Agency report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have NEGATIVE effectiveness as low as MINUS 124%
Last week we told you how the Covid-19 vaccines were proving to …
Children are up to 16 times more likely to die with Covid-19 if they’ve had the Covid Vaccine according to latest UK Health Security Agency report
The latest report from the UK Health Security Agency shows that the …
Share this page to Telegram
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dean Foley
Dean Foley
5 months ago

Depopulation via sterilisation seems to be the order of the day. I hope I’m very wrong.

jane mariouw
jane mariouw
Reply to  Dean Foley
5 months ago

i’d rather see actual screen shots of those Pfizer pages describing
environmental exposure through inhalation and skin contact.

could be true.. but WHAT is actually being shed? if true

hayden
hayden
Reply to  jane mariouw
4 months ago

the spike proteins or “instructions/codes” – through breath, sweat, who knows?! this is a completely new technology being deployed across humanity and I doubt the powers behind this will let us know. Although, self-spreading vaccines have been talked about in scientific fields for a few years now. duckduckgo it, not google because all you’ll get is ‘factcheckers’ Heres the first DDgo that came up https://thetattyjournal.org/2021/05/08/johns-hopkins-university-confirms-that-self-spreading-vaccines-are-real/

James
James
Reply to  hayden
4 months ago

Do you have a link to the John’s Hopkins University study that it refers to?

TheVorta
TheVorta
Reply to  James
2 months ago

It’s on this site as a PDF file. The file name: 181009-gcbr-tech-report.pdf . Just go to the URL below and the first link returned should be it, then you can download it.

The URL: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/Search?search=181009-gcbr-tech-report.pdf

James
James
Reply to  jane mariouw
4 months ago

Nanotech? Maybe the magnetic field had something to do with it.

trackback
4 months ago

[…] that women are reporting the same symptoms after being near others who have had the Covid jab, and Pfizer confirm in their own safety document that vaccine shedding is a real possibility and they had grave concerns about it during phase 1 and […]

xxx
xxx
4 months ago

I’m refusing the vaccine due to fertility concerns. I can confirm I was around a vaccinated woman, started my period 6 days early, just a few days after being with her, it was twice as long and twice as heavy. The fuck?

trackback
4 months ago

[…] that women are reporting the same symptoms after being near others who have had the Covid jab, and Pfizer confirm in their own safety document that vaccine shedding is a real possibility and they had grave concerns about it during phase 1 […]

James
James
4 months ago

What can we do to protect ourselves from this shedding? Is colloidal/ionic silver an option?

I’ve had itchy skin recently and I’m wondering if it’s from having been around my mum since she had the second Pfizer jab.

James
James
4 months ago

Correct me if I’m wrong, but the Pfizer document seems to suggest that exposure *may* occur via inhalation or via skin contact with a vaccinated person.

But what if the chance of such environmental exposure is miniscule/negligible? Could it be a part of a psyop to make us think, “Well, it seems like I’ve quite possibly been inadvertently vaccinated anyway, so I may as well get an actual jab in order to reclaim some freedoms…”

I could be miles off, but it would be a winner for Pfizer.

trackback
3 months ago

[…] women are reporting the same symptoms after being near others who have had the Covid jab, and Pfizer confirm in their own safety document that vaccine shedding is a real possibility and they had grave concerns about it during phase […]

trackback
8 days ago

[…] there is also a correlation between women who are physically in the presence of people who have had a Covid injection and miscarriage, even though they themselves have not had an injection. There are also indications of illness in […]