Breaking News

Is it all a lie? – Stay at Home > Protect the NHS > 100K Deaths – An analysis of ONS and NHS data


Buy us a coffee!

In March 2020 the order was given “to stay at home” as the government and their circle of scientific advisors needed “three weeks” to flatten the curve. Eleven months later and the United Kingdom is still under a “stay at home” order and has been told over one-hundred-thousand people have now died from Covid-19. Stay at home > Protect the NHS > Save lives has been the mantra of the UK Government and millions of their docile followers in the past year.

But what would you do if you found out you had given up a year of your life due to a big fat lie? What would you do if you found out you’ve been staying at home to protect an NHS that has been at an all time low capacity compared to the last five years? What would you do if you found out there haven’t actually been 100,000 deaths due to Covid-19 but instead a campaign of fear that has manipulated data to trick you into thinking there have been thousands of Covid deaths per day?

Well ‘The Daily Expose’ investigated, and we suggest you fasten your seat-belts because this is what we found…

The above graph is a heat map showing deaths within 28 days of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 by date of death and age of the person. This data can be seen at the UK Gov’s. coronavirus dashboard here. Whats pretty clear from this data is that the most alleged Covid deaths have occurred in people aged 90+. The next age group with the most deaths being 85 – 89, then 80 – 84 and so on and so on. There’s a general decrease in the number of deaths up to about the 65-69 age group but then we see a dramatic fall to pretty much zero in anyone aged under about the age of 60.

Now lockdown fanatics will argue that 60 years old is too young to die. And they’re right it is. But this heat map shows that there have generally been no more than 9 deaths in a single day of anyone aged between 60 – 64. In the 65-69 year old group there have been no more than 20 deaths a day. In the 70-74 year old group no more than 27 deaths in a day. In the 75-79 group no more than than 48 deaths in a day, at it’s highest. It isn’t until we get to the 85-89 year old group that we start to see a large increase in the number of alleged Covid deaths. 179 deaths in a day at its highest. Then we have the 90+ age group which has seen no more than 379 deaths in a single day at it’s highest.

So what we’re seeing here is that is a negligible amount of “Covid” deaths in anyone under the age of 60. But we’re really not seeing very many “Covid” deaths in anybody aged between 60 and 80. What we are seeing is a much higher amount of “Covid” deaths in people aged over 85. But what’s so strange about that?

The average life expectancy in the UK is 81 years. Yet the UK has enforced dictatorial tyranny, destroyed the economy, decimated businesses and people’s livelihoods and created a flood of mental health issues because people who have lived longer than the average life expectancy of 81 are dying. These people have already statistically lived beyond their years. What on earth is the UK government playing at?

The above table shows deaths that occurred in people aged 85-89 + people aged 90 and over in December 2020 and December 2019. There has been an increase of around 1500 in both age groups in December 2020 from December 2019. Now this isn’t the astronomical increase you would expect in the year of the “deadly” pandemic is it? And these are the age groups we have just clarified to you as being the ones with an astronomically higher rate of alleged Covid deaths compared to all other age groups. So we’ll ask again, what on earth is the UK government playing at?


We need your support! – By paying your TV License, every month you are donating £13.33 to the BBC who report propaganda and lies. Why not donate that to ‘The Daily Expose’ to enable us to bring you the facts that the mainstream refuse to?


Please click the red button to donate via PayPal
Hate PayPal? Then please click the ‘Donate Now’ button to donate by card

The Anatomy of a Perfect Call to Action & Why they are Critical for Site Conversions - Inbound Now - November 5, 2013
Image result for donate today button

So far we’ve clarified that the people allegedly dying from Covid are the same people that have statistically lived beyond their life expectancy, but what if they’re not actually dying from Covid? As you saw in the heat map the data is based on people that have died “within 28 days” of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2. This means that if the person is to die from anything else but had received the positive test within 28 days of the deaths then it is labelled as a Covid death.

This means if the person dies in a car accident but tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the previous 28 days they are added to the Covid death statistics. This fact is deeply troubling when we apply it to the fact the majority of people in the Covid death statistics are statistically for want of a better phrase “past their sell by date” anyway. It has to be without doubt that people who are generally dying of old age are being added to the death statistics, meaning they are being artificially inflated to justify the enforcement of dictatorial tyranny in the form of lockdowns.

The above table taken from official ONS data (You can find the official ONS data here) shows that in December 2020 Dementia and Alzheimer deaths were down on the December five-year average. Even more interesting than that though is it shows deaths due to Chronic lower respiratory diseases and due to Influenza and Pneumonia halved in December 2020 compared to the five-year average. This proves that Covid deaths are being artificially inflated.

There can be no doubt that influenza cases and deaths are being recorded as Covid-19 cases and deaths. According to a report released by the World Health Organisation (you can find the report here), influenza is now non existent throughout the world.

The data set shows that influenza was rife throughout the northern hemisphere up to around week 11 of 2020 and that there was a sudden rapid decline from then on, until it was virtually eradicated by week 15. The data shows that there have been no positive specimens in the northern hemisphere throughout the rest of 2020.

Influenza data

Lockdown fanatics will say influenza has been eradicated because of social distancing measures and the controls put in place, but if that were the case why on earth are we seeing so many positive cases of SARS-CoV-2? It has become laborious to have to listen to people contradict themselves by applying logic to suit the official narrative.

If influenza has been eradicated because of social distancing measures then we would be seeing the same data for SARS-CoV-2. We’re not. So either flu hasn’t been eradicated and it is being recorded as Covid to give the illusion it has OR flu has been eradicated and we’re seeing a huge amount of false positives thanks to the unreliable PCR test that is used to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

PCR tests look for genetic matter from the new coronavirus using amplification cycles. However, the number of amplification cycles that was needed to detect genetic matter from the virus, which is referred to as the cycle threshold, typically isn’t included in test results sent to doctors and patients. Many coronavirus tests have fairly high cycle thresholds, with most set at 40 and some set at 37. That means a number of patients who aren’t carrying much of the new coronavirus are still testing positive, even though they may not be contagious. You can read our full breakdown on the PCR test here.

People with no symptoms are being tested, and the tests are being carried out at high cycles where it is essentially possible to find anything you want to find according to the inventor of the test, Kary Mullis. So there can be no doubt we’re seeing a humongous amount of false positives.

How coronavirus throat, nose tests work: RT-PCR method, explained -  Business Insider

We’ve been though a lot so we’ll summarise where we’re up to – so far we’ve clarified that the people allegedly dying from Covid are the same people that have statistically lived beyond their life expectancy. However they may not be actually dying from Covid due to the fact the deaths are recorded from any death that occurs within 28 days of a positive test. And we know this is happening thanks to the ONS data showing us a reduction in other leading causes of deaths compared to the five-year average. Plus the fact influenza is now statistically shown to be non existent. But we also now know these people may not even be testing positive at all due to the high cycle rate that has been used on the PCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2.

But all of the above has been used to enforce dictatorial tyranny, destroy the economy, decimate businesses and people’s livelihoods, and create a flood of mental health issues. So maybe this has all been done to protect the NHS? Maybe that’s why the general public have had to give up almost one year of their already short lives?

So we took a look at the official NHS data (You can find the official NHS data here). Starting with the data on people arriving to hospital by ambulance. We compared the data for 30th and 31st January 2021 (the height of lockdown 3) with the same dates in 2020 (pre pandemic).

As you can see in the tables above people arriving by ambulance at the height of ‘Lockdown 3’ was down by around 1500 on the previous year. As was the delays. But we’ve been told by the mainstream news that ambulance requirments and waiting times are at an all time high? They’re lying to you!

Next we took a look at general and acute bed occupancy for the same dates.

As you can see in the tables above there were in fact more available beds before the “pandemic” struck the United Kingdom than there are now. But there were an awful lot more of them occupied before the pandemic struck. On the 31st January 2020 there were 97.857 beds available, and 92,029 of them were occupied, meaning there were only around 5000 left spare. However on the 31st January 2021, at the height of the pandemic in ‘Lockdown 3’ there were 7000 less beds available at 90,684. But only 77,413 were taken, meaning there was a total of 13,000 beds left spare.

Image
Credit : @Stat-O-Guy

As you can see in the graph above the same pattern has occurred since the start of December 2020 compared with the previous year. General and Acute bed occupancy has been dramatically down on the previous year. Yet the British public have been told to stay at home and protect the NHS. From what?

The same can be said for long stay patients compared to pre-pandemic. On the 30th January 2020 there were 16,206 longstay patients that had been in hospital for more than 21 days. Yet on the 30th January 2021 there were only 11,500 longstay patients that had been in hospital for more than 21 days.

Longstay data 2020 (pre-pandemic)

Longstay data 2021

Next we took a look at A&E attendance in the months of April (Lockdown 1) and November (Lockdown 2) for 2020 and compared this with April and November in 2018 and 2019.

  • 2018 – April – 1,984,369 attended A&E / November – 2,036,847 attended A&E
  • 2019 – April – 2,112,165 attended A&E / November – 2,143,505 attended A&E
  • 2020 – April – 916,581 attended A&E / November – 1,485,132 attended A&E

Fifty-Seven Percent Down! A&E attendance at what was the supposed height of what the authorities dubbed the “first wave” was 57% down on the previous year. November was busier but it was still 31% down on November in 2019. We hope you are as shocked about this as we were?


Surely if we were in the midst of a “deadly pandemic” in which we had to “stay at home to protect the NHS” we would expect to see a huge increase in people in hospital? But that hasn’t been the case. Which leads us to ask a very serious question. If our hospitals have been far from overwhelmed and had the capacity to treat people as normal why on earth have we seen a humongous increase in deaths occurring at home during the “pandemic” compared to the five year average?

The table above which has been taken from official ONS data shows a huge increase in deaths occuring in care homes and at home. There can only be one conclusion. Lockdown kills and the fear propaganda released by the authorities whipped the general public into refusing to use the NHS either out of fear of catching the virus or because they were under the impression it was overwhelmed and wanted to protect it. This is a national scandal!

Finally we looked at the death rate of 2020 compared to the previous 20 years, just to see if this was reason enough to enforce dictatorial tyranny, destroy the economy, decimate businesses and people’s livelihoods, and create a flood of mental health issues.

The total number of deaths that occurred in 2020 was 569,770, that translated to a rate of 1037.4 per 100,000 people in England. Which is the highest number and rate in the last decade. But not by a lot. 2018 had the second highest number of deaths in the last decade with 505,859 deaths. But the second highest death rate was in 2015, with 985.9 deaths per 100,000 people in England. But if we go back to 2010 the rate is pretty much comparable with 2020, and as we start to rewind the years we only need to go back to 2008 and every previous year down to 2001 and the rate of deaths per 100,000 is higher than 2020.

2008 had a death rate of 1084.2 per 100,000 people in England. 2005 had 1137.6 per 100,000. And 2001 had 1229.8 per 100,000. So every year prior to 2009 had a higher death rate per 100,000 than 2020. But the difference between 2020 and those years is that in 2020 we were ordered to “stay at home, protect the NHS and save lives”.

Which brings us to the conclusion. We’ve found that the majority who have allegedly died from Covid are statistically “past their sell by date”, but they might not have even died from Covid due to the fact Covid deaths are recorded when any death occurs within 28 days of a positive test, even if it’s from a car accident.

Because of ONS data showing a reduction in other leading caused of death compared to the five-year average, and the fact influenza is now statistically shown to be non existent we know for a fact the Covid death statistics have been artificially inflated. But even more worrying than that is we know people may not even be testing positive for Covid at all due to the high cycle rate that has been used on the PCR test.

We also now know that hospitals have been at half capacity throughout the pandemic, most likely as a result of the fear propaganda which scared people into thinking they would be a burden on what they assumed was an overwhelmed NHS, or because they were scared of catching the virus.

And we now know the death rate has been comparable to the first 10 years of the new millennium (which only began 21 years ago).

So it’s hard to come to any conclusion other than the British people have given up a full year of their short lives on the foundation of one of the biggest lies in history. They have stayed at home to protect an NHS that seems to have had a holiday, and been conned into thinking 100,000 people have died from Covid, when in fact they have died due to the lockdown and due to falling for the fear propaganda released by the UK Government and it’s circle of scientists. All of this has resulted in the destruction of the economy, a new regime of dictatorial tyranny and created a wave of despair in millions of lives.

The question is, now that you know, what will you do?

You can find the official ONS data here

You can find the official NHS data here



We urgently need your support!
We rely solely on your support to help

fund our investigative reports.
If you like what we do then please help us to
keep doing it by supporting us today.


Please choose your preferred
method to show your support


USA: Federal Health Employees Blow the Whistle. Coming Soon…
Starting tomorrow, Project Veritas is launching a series of videos exposing USA …
Professor Sunetra Gupta: “Herd immunity probably takes the prize for being the most misunderstood term of 2020.”
Sunetra Gupta is Professor of Theoretical Epidemiology in the Department of Zoology, …
Nurse claims fully vaccinated Covid-19 patients are being treated with Ivermectin whilst the unvaccinated are being put on ventilators
A nurse of 40 years has claimed that fully vaccinated Covid-19 patients …
URGENT! – 13 reasons why you should not allow your Child to get the Covid-19 Vaccine
At a press conference on Monday September 13th, the four Chief Medical …
BREAKING – 62% of all excess deaths since March 2020 have occurred at home; but just 3% are associated with Covid-19 – Are the Covid-19 Vaccines killing thousands?
Since March 7th 2020 there have been 250,725 deaths that have occurred …
FDA experts reveal the Covid-19 Vaccines are killing at least 2 people for every 1 life they save as they vote 16 – 2 against the approval of booster shots
FDA experts have unexpectedly voted against approving Covid-19 vaccination boosters for anyone …
BREAKING – Fully vaccinated account for a huge 74% of Covid-19 deaths in the UK summer wave according to latest Public Health England report
The latest Public Health England technical briefing on Covid-19 variants of concern …
The “Pandemic” Has Ended for Much of India, How Did They Do It? – Not With Covid Injections but a Drug That Costs Less Than £2 Per Person: Ivermectin
Dr. Pierre Kory, an American pulmonary and critical care specialist and founding …
Judge in New York Temporarily Halts State’s Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate
Healthcare workers in New York have been given a temporary reprieve from …

Share this page to Telegram
4.4 13 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
60 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
7 months ago

Look into the NOIDs (Notification of Infectious Diseases) data published by PHE (Public Health England. Just <14,000 cases of COVID-19 aka Flu in 2020, 63 for week 3/2021, 115 week 4/2021 throughout England and Wales as reported by Healthcare Professionals! https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/notifiable-diseases-weekly-reports-for-2021

richard hart
richard hart
7 months ago

Great article. It would be more convincing to people if you could state ONS links and page numbers, with your article. Many thanks

Richard
Richard
Reply to  The Daily Expose
7 months ago

Great article. The other thing that needs to be pointed out is that one of the reasons the NHS say they may be near capacity and not able to cope is because they allowed thousands and thousands of staff to self isolate for no reason in the middle of a pandemic

trackback
7 months ago

[…] been labelled as “Definitely Covid” and has been added to the Covid death statistics (Don’t believe us? See our in depth analysis of ONS and NHS data here). But of course we’re only allowed to use this method of counting deaths when it comes to […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] has been labelled as “Definitely Covid” and has been added to the Covid death statistics (Don’t believe us? See our in depth analysis of ONS and NHS data here). But of course we’re only allowed to use this method of counting deaths when it comes to Covid. […]

Will
Will
7 months ago

Brilliant work but how to get the message to the sheep? Will share share share

trackback
7 months ago

[…] An NHS that the public were told would be overwhelmed if they did not comply with dictatorial tyranny. Except it wasn’t was it? A&E attendance, ambulance requirements and waiting times, general and acute beds, and long stay beds were all dramatically down throughout 2020 and in January 2021 compared to the previous five years. (As we proved in the article you can find here). […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] und in die Covid-Todes­sta­tistik aufge­nommen (Sie glauben das nicht? Dann sehen Sie sich die einge­hende Analyse der ONS- und NHS-Daten an). Aber natür­lich dürfen wir diese Methode der Zählung von […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] i włąc­zone do staty­styk zgonów kowi­dal­nych (nie wier­zysz? Następnie sprawdź szcze­gółową analizę danych ONS i NHS). Ale oczy­wiście tę metodę liczenia zgonów musimy stosować tylko w […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] the problem, we know it isn’t deadly thanks to a years worth of data on this pandemic (see here). The authorities have used a hammer to crack a walnut in their response to this alleged disease by […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] und in die Covid-Todesstatistik aufgenommen (Sie glauben das nicht? Dann sehen Sie sich die eingehende Analyse der ONS- und NHS-Daten an). Aber natürlich dürfen wir diese Methode der Zählung von […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] smrt je označena kot “definitivno Covid” in je bil dodan v statistiki smrti Covid (Do nas ne verjamem ? Glejte našo poglobljeno analizo podatkov ONS in NHS tukaj) . Seveda pa lahko to metodo štetja smrti uporabljamo samo, ko gre za Covid. Ker gre za cepivo, nam […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] und in die Covid-Todesstatistik aufgenommen (Sie glauben das nicht? Dann sehen Sie sich die eingehende Analyse der ONS- und NHS-Daten an). Aber natürlich dürfen wir diese Methode der Zählung von Todesfällen […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] being over stated – which we highly suspect they are as we’ve explained numerous times (see here) – or there really are this number of Covid-19 deaths occurring. But both these […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] έχει προστεθεί στα στατιστικά στοιχεία θανάτου Covid (Δεν μας πιστεύετε; Δείτε την εις βάθος ανάλυση των δεδο…). Φυσικά, επιτρέπεται μόνο να χρησιμοποιούμε αυτήν τη […]

trackback
7 months ago

[…] death has been labelled as “Definitely Covid” and has been added to the Covid death statistics (Don’t believe us? See our in depth analysis of ONS and NHS data here). But of course we’re only allowed to use this method of counting deaths when it comes to Covid. […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] has been labelled as “Definitely Covid” and has been added to the Covid death statistics (Don’t believe us? See our in depth analysis of ONS and NHS data here). But of course we’re only allowed to use this method of counting deaths when it comes to Covid. […]

Anonymous
Anonymous
6 months ago

You absolute divs.

trackback
6 months ago

[…] is bestempeld als ‘Definitely Covid’ en is toegevoegd aan de Covid-sterftecijfers  (geloof ons niet Zie hier onze diepgaande analyse van ONS- en NHS-gegevens) . Maar we mogen deze methode om sterfgevallen te tellen natuurlijk alleen gebruiken als het om […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] are being over stated – which we highly suspect they are as we’ve explained numerous times (see here) – or there really are this number of Covid-19 deaths occurring. But both these […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] death has been labelled as “Definitely Covid” and has been added to the Covid death statistics (Don’t believe us? See our in depth analysis of ONS and NHS data here). But of course we’re only allowed to use this method of counting deaths when it comes to Covid. […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] are being over stated – which we highly suspect they are as we’ve explained numerous times (see here) – or there really are this number of Covid-19 deaths occurring. But both these answers […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] we’ve proven the Covid deaths have been greatly overstated – you can see the evidence here, here and […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] When compared to an alleged total of 120,000 “Covid” deaths occurring in the UK does it seem worth it? We think not as we’ve proven the Covid deaths have been greatly overstated – you can see the evidence here, here and here. […]

Anonymous
Anonymous
6 months ago

Very informative

trackback
6 months ago

[…] we’ve proven the Covid deaths have been greatly overstated – you can see the evidence here, here and […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] Covid-19 že več kot navedeno – kar močno sumimo, da so, kot smo že večkrat razložili ( tukaj), glej – ali pa res obstaja toliko smrtnih primerov Covid-19. Toda oba odgovora vodita k […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] mainstream journalist has thrown more evidence into the ring to confirm what we already knew, that the Covid death statistics are enormously exaggerated and […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] And we now know the death rate has been comparable to the first 10 years of the new millennium (which only began 21 years ago). All of this is evidenced in our previous article here. […]

Marian O’looney
Marian O’looney
6 months ago

The fact that the government changed the law on death certificates last March in that Doctors can now no longer be prosecuted for placing the WRONG cause of death on certificates just before this pandemic took off in our country speaks volumes to me.

trackback
6 months ago

[…] Is it all a lie? – Stay at Home > Protect the NHS > 100K Deaths – An analysis of O… […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] Read More: Is it all a lie? – Stay at Home > Protect the NHS > 100K Deaths – An analysis of ONS and N… […]

Anonymous
Anonymous
6 months ago

Nothing ever made any sense, Right from the beginning the figures and statistics never added up. The empty Covid sites, the empty hospitals, Police harassment of people who exposed these facts, contracts going to ministers mates, vaccines that aren’t vaccines. Truth will out in the end, it always does.

Mike worstead
Mike worstead
6 months ago

There is nothing new in this information, it merely goes to illustrate to all those people who believe the BBC magazine @news’ programme are completely brainwashed by the daily gloom they have been sreving uplike Chinese torture. Drip,drip,drip, covid,covid, covid – stay at home and send your brain to sleep. The government have used the 77th brigade, the psychological warefare unit against the population as has every other government that signed up to the UN Agenda 21. This is the work of money and power grabbing eugenicists from Bill Gates and Claus Schwab and my MSP claims it is a matter of opinion and will no longer respond to anything I send him by way of fact based information.

trackback
6 months ago

[…] are being over stated – which we highly suspect they are as we’ve explained numerous times (see here) – or there really are this number of Covid-19 deaths occurring. But both these […]

johnaspray
johnaspray
6 months ago

Even when you catch them out, nothing happens. https://youtu.be/r29LbYyL0po

Kori
Kori
6 months ago

You forgot to mention that if you die from a heart attack or any other illness because you didn’t seek medical help out of fear of catching covid at the hospital or because you didn’t want to overload the health care system…. those deaths are considered covid deaths as well…. even if you don’t test positive. If you take your own life from depression over covid lockdowns, that is also considered a covid death.

Mr Flewit
Mr Flewit
6 months ago

Great stuff, it might be good to also include the number of bed capacity in hospitals since around 1995 onwards. There has been an 80,000 bed reduction (almost 1/3rd) since the year 2000. I am sure the NHS has been at breaking point each winter for several years due to this.

Anonymous
Anonymous
6 months ago

Excellent example of the truth

Anonymous
Anonymous
6 months ago

Time for some serious civil disobedience!

Anonymous
Anonymous
6 months ago

All who read this are all who already know this and all who know this can not get the people who wont to read it. It will take years maybe decades for all that fell for this bullshit to even admit it to them selves let alone others. Some will never admit they were wrong.

trackback
6 months ago

[…] Is it all a lie? – Stay at Home > Protect the NHS > 100K Deaths – An analysis of ONS and NHS data (link). […]

trackback
6 months ago

[…] Is it all a lie? – Stay at Home > Protect the NHS > 100K Deaths – An analysis of ONS and NHS data (link). […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] And we now know the death rate has been comparable to the first 10 years of the new millennium (which only began 21 years ago). All of this is evidenced in our previous article here. […]

trackback
5 months ago

[…] And the lack of questions is the reason people are excited to take an experimental vaccine because it might give them back their freedom. Not because it might protect them against Covid-19. (Source) […]

JcEntralbanksWS
JcEntralbanksWS
5 months ago

Hi there, great article. Very succinct and well put together, one of the few that does so without being too reactionary.

I’m looking for the yearly total deaths for England so that I can be confident when I state no excess deaths. I followed your links to the ONS page but it’s a bit of a minefield (probably intentionally).
Could you add the total yearly death figures to the article or highlight exactly where they are obtained? The totals ive found for England seem to be a bit out.

Greg
Greg
5 months ago

Your findings don’t surprise me in the least. From the beginning something rang warning bells after looking at the supposed global Covid figures.
The three things that stood out from the figures:
1. How few Covid cases there were globally compared to annual flu cases for instance.
2. The lack of death correlation for a pandemic compared to heart disease and cancer deaths in the UK.
3. How low the deaths were in terms of percentage of the total number of cases reported. At one point it had reached just over 5%. However, this has now dropped and fallen back to around 1% which would be around the normal amount for flu.
The question to be asked was the higher percentage due to over reporting or miss reporting deaths as Covid when in fact it was something else?
Up until the last few months the total deaths from Covid globally was less than the number of deaths annually from either cancer or heart disease in the UK which runs at around the 175k for each.
The data being put out by all the governments of the world is very questionable at best.
However, the real biggie now is, how skewed will the figures become once deaths begin to stack up from those who have had the vaccine?

trackback
5 months ago

[…] ekleniverdiler. (ONS ve NHS (sağlık bakanlığı) verileri üzerindeki analizimizi okumak için buraya bakınız). Fakat tabii ölümleri bir tek Covid için bu şekilde sayabiliyoruz, iş aşıdan […]